- Reason
- Another great cityscape photo from Benh. High quality, aesthetic and of great value to the Bangkok article.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Bangkok and Tiger Cub Economies
- Creator
- Commons:User:Benh
- Support as nominator -- Ðiliff «» (Talk) 10:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Nice EV, interesting to view -- Muhammad (talk) 03:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support per above. Elekhh ( talk) 07:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support, very good quality for a night image of this breadth... and a great view of the city. gren グレン 02:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support beautiful photo, makes me nostalgic for when I lived there. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 05:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Weak Support Very good quality but as per prev night shots up for nom there are several well lit areas that appear to be detail-less due to over-exposure... Im not too technical so not sure if that's exactly the right reason but I know what I'm trying to say! Most noticable on the centre tall building with the well lit white top - I cannot view much detail on the top of that building due to what I think are blown highlights... Other than a few little examples of this the picture as a whole is very good but I can't give full support as IMO I think this harms the picture...
Gazhiley (
talk)
13:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm in agreement with you on that point. If it were me, I would have reduced the exposure a little which, as you said, would have minimised the detail lost to blown highights. Still, as it is, I think it's still a great image.
Ðiliff «»
(Talk)
13:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Exactly... I knew it was something like that... Yeah still a great picture hence support, just not a full support with those issues... Gazhiley ( talk) 15:26, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm in agreement with you on that point. If it were me, I would have reduced the exposure a little which, as you said, would have minimised the detail lost to blown highights. Still, as it is, I think it's still a great image.
Ðiliff «»
(Talk)
13:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support wow! -- Alchemist-hp ( talk) 22:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support-- Mbz1 ( talk) 23:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Promoted File:Bangkok Night Wikimedia Commons.jpg -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 20:18, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Reason
- Another great cityscape photo from Benh. High quality, aesthetic and of great value to the Bangkok article.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Bangkok and Tiger Cub Economies
- Creator
- Commons:User:Benh
- Support as nominator -- Ðiliff «» (Talk) 10:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Nice EV, interesting to view -- Muhammad (talk) 03:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support per above. Elekhh ( talk) 07:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support, very good quality for a night image of this breadth... and a great view of the city. gren グレン 02:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support beautiful photo, makes me nostalgic for when I lived there. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 05:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Weak Support Very good quality but as per prev night shots up for nom there are several well lit areas that appear to be detail-less due to over-exposure... Im not too technical so not sure if that's exactly the right reason but I know what I'm trying to say! Most noticable on the centre tall building with the well lit white top - I cannot view much detail on the top of that building due to what I think are blown highlights... Other than a few little examples of this the picture as a whole is very good but I can't give full support as IMO I think this harms the picture...
Gazhiley (
talk)
13:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm in agreement with you on that point. If it were me, I would have reduced the exposure a little which, as you said, would have minimised the detail lost to blown highights. Still, as it is, I think it's still a great image.
Ðiliff «»
(Talk)
13:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Exactly... I knew it was something like that... Yeah still a great picture hence support, just not a full support with those issues... Gazhiley ( talk) 15:26, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm in agreement with you on that point. If it were me, I would have reduced the exposure a little which, as you said, would have minimised the detail lost to blown highights. Still, as it is, I think it's still a great image.
Ðiliff «»
(Talk)
13:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support wow! -- Alchemist-hp ( talk) 22:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support-- Mbz1 ( talk) 23:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Promoted File:Bangkok Night Wikimedia Commons.jpg -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 20:18, 1 March 2010 (UTC)