User:Childzy approached me to nominate this pic for deletion as he didn't know how.
- Neutral -- Fir0002 00:36, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delist. Blurry/grainy not a high enough resolution-- Childzy talk contribs 08:12, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delist It is a good shot, but it is grainy and poort resolustion. Politic a l mind 03:06, 6 July 2024 UTC [ refresh
- Delist - It's a bit grainy and not enormously special, but I think that the two people who voted to delist on resolution have got a bit mixed up - the picture is definitely large enough, at 5510x809! That's on the large side even for a panorama. Maybe they're forgetting that the version on the image page is scaled down - remember that you have to click on the image agin on it's description page to see the full-size version. — Vanderdecken∴ ∫ ξ φ 10:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- comment- i know how big it is (i can open a pic) i thought resolution was the picture quality, which the pic is lacking -- Childzy talk contribs 13:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well it's not.
Image resolution, to be honest. This is an encyclopedia, there's no excuse for not knowing what something is when there's a search bar less than two feet away... —
Vanderdecken∴
∫
ξ
φ
10:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Get over it Childzy ( Talk| Contribs) 11:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. To be honest this is probably the nicest pic of Chicago I've ever seen, even if quality is not quite perfect. -- jjron 06:36, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I like the contrast between city and clouds/water. — BRIAN 0918 • 2006-07-17 19:13
- Keep. -- Vircabutar 20:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep -- Chris 73 | Talk 22:34, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Retained as featured picture Raven4x4x 09:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
User:Childzy approached me to nominate this pic for deletion as he didn't know how.
- Neutral -- Fir0002 00:36, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delist. Blurry/grainy not a high enough resolution-- Childzy talk contribs 08:12, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delist It is a good shot, but it is grainy and poort resolustion. Politic a l mind 03:06, 6 July 2024 UTC [ refresh
- Delist - It's a bit grainy and not enormously special, but I think that the two people who voted to delist on resolution have got a bit mixed up - the picture is definitely large enough, at 5510x809! That's on the large side even for a panorama. Maybe they're forgetting that the version on the image page is scaled down - remember that you have to click on the image agin on it's description page to see the full-size version. — Vanderdecken∴ ∫ ξ φ 10:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- comment- i know how big it is (i can open a pic) i thought resolution was the picture quality, which the pic is lacking -- Childzy talk contribs 13:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well it's not.
Image resolution, to be honest. This is an encyclopedia, there's no excuse for not knowing what something is when there's a search bar less than two feet away... —
Vanderdecken∴
∫
ξ
φ
10:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Get over it Childzy ( Talk| Contribs) 11:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. To be honest this is probably the nicest pic of Chicago I've ever seen, even if quality is not quite perfect. -- jjron 06:36, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I like the contrast between city and clouds/water. — BRIAN 0918 • 2006-07-17 19:13
- Keep. -- Vircabutar 20:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep -- Chris 73 | Talk 22:34, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Retained as featured picture Raven4x4x 09:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC)