Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2017 at 01:30:42 (UTC)
Reason
Excellent quality and engaging depiction of blue wildbeest behaviour in nature - we have relatively few FPs of animals in action (feeding, fighting, etc)
Support as nominator –
ELEKHHT 01:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Support --
Jobas (
talk) 23:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Oppose busy foreground - should be croped. --
PetarM (
talk) 09:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Support Nice EV and great shot. You could crop some of the foreground scrub out but I would support as is also. |→
Spaullyτ 11:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Oppose Unfortunately the foreground spoils this shot. An unobstructed view would be much superior.
Nick-D (
talk) 21:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Oppose due to awkward framing with the obstructed foreground, as well as the slight motion blur - not enough to convey a sense of intensity, but just enough to be annoying. With the camera used, it would have been trivial to bump the ISO up one or two stops to completely freeze the action. – Juliancolton |
Talk 04:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2017 at 01:30:42 (UTC)
Reason
Excellent quality and engaging depiction of blue wildbeest behaviour in nature - we have relatively few FPs of animals in action (feeding, fighting, etc)
Support as nominator –
ELEKHHT 01:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Support --
Jobas (
talk) 23:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Oppose busy foreground - should be croped. --
PetarM (
talk) 09:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Support Nice EV and great shot. You could crop some of the foreground scrub out but I would support as is also. |→
Spaullyτ 11:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Oppose Unfortunately the foreground spoils this shot. An unobstructed view would be much superior.
Nick-D (
talk) 21:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Oppose due to awkward framing with the obstructed foreground, as well as the slight motion blur - not enough to convey a sense of intensity, but just enough to be annoying. With the camera used, it would have been trivial to bump the ISO up one or two stops to completely freeze the action. – Juliancolton |
Talk 04:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)reply