The list was kept by SchroCat 11:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC) [1]. reply
Several users have noted the article contains intricate trivia detail and poor prose. I agree and for this reason, am placing it up for FLRC. DragonZero ( Talk · Contribs) 09:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Of course, this is my opinion, and I will withdrawal if there is consensus the list in its current state meets FL standards. DragonZero ( Talk · Contribs) 23:36, 5 April 2014 (UTC) reply
A request at the Guild of Copy Editors would be helpful, wouldn't it be? The user who will perform the copyedit will trim it and (probably) it will be a user non-familiar with the series. Being non-familiar, he can help to improve accessibility to general readers. (I would request it by myself but there's a limit of two requests per editor at any one time) Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 00:26, 23 April 2014 (UTC) reply
My remaining issues.
Not a big enough issue to raise, I find concision could be further improved. Jumping randomly into the article
"However, Jiraiya manages to take out Nagato's Animal Path vessel and he fashions a new one from a female corpse. During Pain's attack on Konoha, the rest of the Paths were destroyed in the fight against Naruto. Talking with Naruto, Nagato's faith in their mentor and world peace is renewed as he sacrifices his life to revive the people he killed in Konoha." I would remove the first sentence, and revamp the second and third sentence to something along the lines of "defeated and persuaded by Naruto". Otherwise, when my issues are resolved and no other oppositions are raised, I will withdrawal my support for delisting. DragonZero ( Talk · Contribs) 17:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Well, I withdrawal my opposition. Kku brought up points about excessive plot but never attended this FLRC to argue for it so there's no point keeping this open anymore. Just gotta wait for an admin to close this now. DragonZero ( Talk · Contribs) 14:18, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Review closed. The consensus was to retain the FL status. -
SchroCat (
talk)
11:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
The list was delisted by Crisco 1492 07:57, 8 May 2014 (UTC) [2]. reply
I am nominating this for FLRC because this article hasn't aged well since it was promoted in 2007. Honestly the issues the article has were raised in the Lightning Bolt discography review a few years back. Lead issues and lack of referencing in the page cements it to be placed up for review. And that's pretty much it. GamerPro64 03:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC) reply
The list was kept by SchroCat 11:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC) [1]. reply
Several users have noted the article contains intricate trivia detail and poor prose. I agree and for this reason, am placing it up for FLRC. DragonZero ( Talk · Contribs) 09:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Of course, this is my opinion, and I will withdrawal if there is consensus the list in its current state meets FL standards. DragonZero ( Talk · Contribs) 23:36, 5 April 2014 (UTC) reply
A request at the Guild of Copy Editors would be helpful, wouldn't it be? The user who will perform the copyedit will trim it and (probably) it will be a user non-familiar with the series. Being non-familiar, he can help to improve accessibility to general readers. (I would request it by myself but there's a limit of two requests per editor at any one time) Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 00:26, 23 April 2014 (UTC) reply
My remaining issues.
Not a big enough issue to raise, I find concision could be further improved. Jumping randomly into the article
"However, Jiraiya manages to take out Nagato's Animal Path vessel and he fashions a new one from a female corpse. During Pain's attack on Konoha, the rest of the Paths were destroyed in the fight against Naruto. Talking with Naruto, Nagato's faith in their mentor and world peace is renewed as he sacrifices his life to revive the people he killed in Konoha." I would remove the first sentence, and revamp the second and third sentence to something along the lines of "defeated and persuaded by Naruto". Otherwise, when my issues are resolved and no other oppositions are raised, I will withdrawal my support for delisting. DragonZero ( Talk · Contribs) 17:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Well, I withdrawal my opposition. Kku brought up points about excessive plot but never attended this FLRC to argue for it so there's no point keeping this open anymore. Just gotta wait for an admin to close this now. DragonZero ( Talk · Contribs) 14:18, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Review closed. The consensus was to retain the FL status. -
SchroCat (
talk)
11:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
The list was delisted by Crisco 1492 07:57, 8 May 2014 (UTC) [2]. reply
I am nominating this for FLRC because this article hasn't aged well since it was promoted in 2007. Honestly the issues the article has were raised in the Lightning Bolt discography review a few years back. Lead issues and lack of referencing in the page cements it to be placed up for review. And that's pretty much it. GamerPro64 03:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC) reply