The list was kept by Giants2008 01:37, 10 June 2013 [1].
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it is missing entries that are obvious even to the casual tourist - two examples that come to mind are Diamond Head, Hawaii and Molokini. It also had a large amount of article content, which I moved to the article Hawaiian–Emperor seamount chain and for which I received a very uncivil response. Ego White Tray ( talk) 03:48, 17 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Let's hit the brakes. My main issue with this is the obvious missing entries as noted above. I would not have nominated this on the introduction dispute if that was the only problem. Ego White Tray ( talk) 12:44, 21 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Keep & the lead restored - This was a perfectly good list before the nominator removed most of the lead section without discussion. It seems to me that the nominator fails to notice FL criteria 2 which says a FL needs to have an "engaging lead that introduces the subject". Maybe the lead overlaps with the content of Hawaiian – Emperor seamount chain which seems to be quite short, but that doesn't mean the lead should be removed this way. As for the missing entries, it seems to be a problem at first (FL criteria 3), but it is not after I took a serious look. I think the confusion is simply due to the fact that volcano ranges are included in the list instead of individual volcanos. For example, Diamond Head is part of the Koʻolau Range, which is actually included. I am not a geologist, so I don't know if that arrangement is appropriate. Maybe the scope of the list should be refined in order to prevent the confusion?— Chris! c/ t 23:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Keep & the lead restored Per the keeps above. Darkness Shines ( talk) 07:58, 26 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Keep & the lead restored The lead is well written, the alternative of a single sentence lead does injustice to the article. A list article is still an article and not a table data dump. Many lists on Wikipedia do indeed have a one sentence lead, but that does not mean that is the desirable situation, rather a sign that Wikipedia is incomplete. CRwikiCA talk 18:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The list was kept by Giants2008 01:37, 10 June 2013 [1].
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it is missing entries that are obvious even to the casual tourist - two examples that come to mind are Diamond Head, Hawaii and Molokini. It also had a large amount of article content, which I moved to the article Hawaiian–Emperor seamount chain and for which I received a very uncivil response. Ego White Tray ( talk) 03:48, 17 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Let's hit the brakes. My main issue with this is the obvious missing entries as noted above. I would not have nominated this on the introduction dispute if that was the only problem. Ego White Tray ( talk) 12:44, 21 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Keep & the lead restored - This was a perfectly good list before the nominator removed most of the lead section without discussion. It seems to me that the nominator fails to notice FL criteria 2 which says a FL needs to have an "engaging lead that introduces the subject". Maybe the lead overlaps with the content of Hawaiian – Emperor seamount chain which seems to be quite short, but that doesn't mean the lead should be removed this way. As for the missing entries, it seems to be a problem at first (FL criteria 3), but it is not after I took a serious look. I think the confusion is simply due to the fact that volcano ranges are included in the list instead of individual volcanos. For example, Diamond Head is part of the Koʻolau Range, which is actually included. I am not a geologist, so I don't know if that arrangement is appropriate. Maybe the scope of the list should be refined in order to prevent the confusion?— Chris! c/ t 23:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Keep & the lead restored Per the keeps above. Darkness Shines ( talk) 07:58, 26 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Keep & the lead restored The lead is well written, the alternative of a single sentence lead does injustice to the article. A list article is still an article and not a table data dump. Many lists on Wikipedia do indeed have a one sentence lead, but that does not mean that is the desirable situation, rather a sign that Wikipedia is incomplete. CRwikiCA talk 18:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC) reply