The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 14:57, 18 August 2012 [1].
Works of Rambhadracharya ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that this list meets the FL criteria. Thanks, :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 07:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC) reply
That's all for now. Bencherlite Talk 19:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from GoP T C N 08:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
*Comments
|
I'm not going to support or oppose this, but I doubt that any list that contains the word "etc" in the second sentence of the lead (as in "His works consist of poems, commentaries, musical compositions of his works, etc.") can justifiably claim to be an example of Wikipedia's finest work. I'm not going to support because I think that the suggestions I made about lack of information about concepts/people/genres, too many small sections and so on, would have been worth acting upon by doing more than adding the odd wikilink. He has also been given many other literary honors and titles, such as Mahakavi and Kavikularatna", for example, is meaningless to me, because I have no idea what the awards (or titles? or honours? or something else?) mean or who awards them, nor why I should be impressed. I'm not going to oppose because I would appear to be in the minority and I don't want to throw spanners in the works unnecessarily. But please improve the prose in the lead, regardless. One other point in passing: is "He composed Śrīrāghavakṛpābhāṣyam on Narada Bhakti Sutra in 1991" in the section "Sanskrit commentaries on the Prasthānatrayī" a reference to Rambhadracharya, or the last person to be mentioned before the word "he", i.e. the former prime minister? Bencherlite Talk 22:58, 12 August 2012 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 14:57, 18 August 2012 [1].
Works of Rambhadracharya ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that this list meets the FL criteria. Thanks, :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 07:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC) reply
That's all for now. Bencherlite Talk 19:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from GoP T C N 08:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
*Comments
|
I'm not going to support or oppose this, but I doubt that any list that contains the word "etc" in the second sentence of the lead (as in "His works consist of poems, commentaries, musical compositions of his works, etc.") can justifiably claim to be an example of Wikipedia's finest work. I'm not going to support because I think that the suggestions I made about lack of information about concepts/people/genres, too many small sections and so on, would have been worth acting upon by doing more than adding the odd wikilink. He has also been given many other literary honors and titles, such as Mahakavi and Kavikularatna", for example, is meaningless to me, because I have no idea what the awards (or titles? or honours? or something else?) mean or who awards them, nor why I should be impressed. I'm not going to oppose because I would appear to be in the minority and I don't want to throw spanners in the works unnecessarily. But please improve the prose in the lead, regardless. One other point in passing: is "He composed Śrīrāghavakṛpābhāṣyam on Narada Bhakti Sutra in 1991" in the section "Sanskrit commentaries on the Prasthānatrayī" a reference to Rambhadracharya, or the last person to be mentioned before the word "he", i.e. the former prime minister? Bencherlite Talk 22:58, 12 August 2012 (UTC) reply