The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 18:26, 7 February 2011 [1].
Nightwish discography ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because i've just solved all the problems cited during the last nomination. So, i think it's ready now. Rodrigo15 ( talk) 01:05, 15 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Support. I've done a little copy editing, and I see no problems otherwise.
The Utahraptor
Talk/
Contribs 03:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC) Oppose per GreatOrangePumpkin. Sorry for the mistakes; this is the first time I've voted in an FLC.
The Utahraptor
Talk/
Contribs
14:04, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
reply
| colspan="23" style="font-size:8pt;"| "—" denotes releases that did not chart.
done
singles
-> singles
I will add more comments, if I find any. Please have a look at discogs like Miles Davis discography or Santana discography. -- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 13:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Please don't write {{
done}} if you haven't do that. And you must write, let's say 4×Platinum, an not 4 times Platinum.--
♫Greatorangepumpkin♫
T
21:08, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
reply
More comments tomorrow. Goodbye.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 22:22, 15 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Needs tidying up in places, but, until I'm shown otherwise, too many of those sources look questionable... J Milburn ( talk) 01:10, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment Rodrigo15, I think it would be wise to withdraw the nomination and deal with these comments outside the FLC process. I'm sure the editors who have contributed comments would be happy to help you en route to a renomination? The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:43, 19 January 2011 (UTC) reply
More comments from J Milburn-
This is still feeling a way off featured quality, but at least the sourcing is looking a little better. The overreliance on the official site is less than ideal... J Milburn ( talk) 21:42, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 18:26, 7 February 2011 [1].
Nightwish discography ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because i've just solved all the problems cited during the last nomination. So, i think it's ready now. Rodrigo15 ( talk) 01:05, 15 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Support. I've done a little copy editing, and I see no problems otherwise.
The Utahraptor
Talk/
Contribs 03:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC) Oppose per GreatOrangePumpkin. Sorry for the mistakes; this is the first time I've voted in an FLC.
The Utahraptor
Talk/
Contribs
14:04, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
reply
| colspan="23" style="font-size:8pt;"| "—" denotes releases that did not chart.
done
singles
-> singles
I will add more comments, if I find any. Please have a look at discogs like Miles Davis discography or Santana discography. -- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 13:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Please don't write {{
done}} if you haven't do that. And you must write, let's say 4×Platinum, an not 4 times Platinum.--
♫Greatorangepumpkin♫
T
21:08, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
reply
More comments tomorrow. Goodbye.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 22:22, 15 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Needs tidying up in places, but, until I'm shown otherwise, too many of those sources look questionable... J Milburn ( talk) 01:10, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment Rodrigo15, I think it would be wise to withdraw the nomination and deal with these comments outside the FLC process. I'm sure the editors who have contributed comments would be happy to help you en route to a renomination? The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:43, 19 January 2011 (UTC) reply
More comments from J Milburn-
This is still feeling a way off featured quality, but at least the sourcing is looking a little better. The overreliance on the official site is less than ideal... J Milburn ( talk) 21:42, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply