The list was promoted by Dabomb87 23:27, 8 December 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating my first tallest buildings list and I think it fulfills the FL criteria. — Chris! c/ t 22:22, 25 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment - Looking over the history of the article, User:Hydrogen Iodide should also get credit for this nomination, as he was also a primary contributor to the article. -- [[ SRE.K.A.L.| L.A.K.ERS]] 22:50, 25 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from NMajdan |
---|
Comments
— NMajdan• talk 15:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply
|
Support.— NMajdan• talk 12:17, 27 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:55, 18 November 2009 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 13:09, 31 October 2009 (UTC) reply
|
Comments from WFCforLife
Resolved comments from WFCforLife ( talk) 01:13, 14 November 2009 (UTC) reply |
---|
* "Tallest building in the 1900s" could do with a footnote to disambiguate between the decade and the century. I know it's a bit picky, but sort by year and you will see why this could potentially cause confusion.
I'll leave it there for now. As an aside I absolutely love the panoramic shot. WFCforLife ( talk) 07:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from bamse ( talk) 00:06, 8 December 2009 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments: Good article, but some questions.
bamse ( talk) 19:03, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply two more questions:
|
Support. bamse ( talk) 00:06, 8 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment - "feet (m)" should be "feet (meters)" or "ft (m)". --[[
SRE.K.A.L.|
L.A.K.ERS]]
23:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
reply
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 23:27, 8 December 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating my first tallest buildings list and I think it fulfills the FL criteria. — Chris! c/ t 22:22, 25 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment - Looking over the history of the article, User:Hydrogen Iodide should also get credit for this nomination, as he was also a primary contributor to the article. -- [[ SRE.K.A.L.| L.A.K.ERS]] 22:50, 25 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from NMajdan |
---|
Comments
— NMajdan• talk 15:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply
|
Support.— NMajdan• talk 12:17, 27 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:55, 18 November 2009 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 13:09, 31 October 2009 (UTC) reply
|
Comments from WFCforLife
Resolved comments from WFCforLife ( talk) 01:13, 14 November 2009 (UTC) reply |
---|
* "Tallest building in the 1900s" could do with a footnote to disambiguate between the decade and the century. I know it's a bit picky, but sort by year and you will see why this could potentially cause confusion.
I'll leave it there for now. As an aside I absolutely love the panoramic shot. WFCforLife ( talk) 07:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from bamse ( talk) 00:06, 8 December 2009 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments: Good article, but some questions.
bamse ( talk) 19:03, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply two more questions:
|
Support. bamse ( talk) 00:06, 8 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment - "feet (m)" should be "feet (meters)" or "ft (m)". --[[
SRE.K.A.L.|
L.A.K.ERS]]
23:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
reply