The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 23:09, 28 March 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because... I would like to take the topic to Featured Topic, and I feel this list is as well researched as possible given the obscurity of the time period. All comments welcomed! But I'm not a big "list coder" so if you want me to do something fancy with the code of the list, be prepared to help me through it. I'm much more comfortable with FAC and prose and sources than I am with wikimarkup for tables... Ealdgyth - Talk 00:27, 14 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
Comment Is it really necessary to have a separate List of members of the Gregorian mission? Why not just include the table in the main article when it is such a short one? -- Skizzik talk 10:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Support Comments from
Dabomb87 (
talk ·
contribs) Minor things, really, because I looked at the article beforehand. It's good stuff, and no, I'm not just saying that because I'm
Catholic!
Sources look good (not that I expected them to be any other way). Dabomb87 ( talk) 14:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC) reply
display:none
style to achieve that. —
neuro
(talk)
00:36, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replyResolved comments from Bencherlite
|
---|
Just a few minor suggestions:
Otherwise, looking good. Bencherlite Talk 13:20, 17 March 2009 (UTC) reply |
Support. I wonder whether the use of "we" and "us" in the second para of the lead is appropriate, but the alternative may be the passive voice (gasp!) which also has its critics. Anyway, if you can think of another way of phrasing it, please do, but I'm happy to support. (I like the picture you found in particular). Bencherlite Talk 20:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 23:09, 28 March 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because... I would like to take the topic to Featured Topic, and I feel this list is as well researched as possible given the obscurity of the time period. All comments welcomed! But I'm not a big "list coder" so if you want me to do something fancy with the code of the list, be prepared to help me through it. I'm much more comfortable with FAC and prose and sources than I am with wikimarkup for tables... Ealdgyth - Talk 00:27, 14 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
Comment Is it really necessary to have a separate List of members of the Gregorian mission? Why not just include the table in the main article when it is such a short one? -- Skizzik talk 10:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Support Comments from
Dabomb87 (
talk ·
contribs) Minor things, really, because I looked at the article beforehand. It's good stuff, and no, I'm not just saying that because I'm
Catholic!
Sources look good (not that I expected them to be any other way). Dabomb87 ( talk) 14:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC) reply
display:none
style to achieve that. —
neuro
(talk)
00:36, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replyResolved comments from Bencherlite
|
---|
Just a few minor suggestions:
Otherwise, looking good. Bencherlite Talk 13:20, 17 March 2009 (UTC) reply |
Support. I wonder whether the use of "we" and "us" in the second para of the lead is appropriate, but the alternative may be the passive voice (gasp!) which also has its critics. Anyway, if you can think of another way of phrasing it, please do, but I'm happy to support. (I like the picture you found in particular). Bencherlite Talk 20:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC) reply