The list was promoted by Dabomb87 03:26, 6 July 2012 [1].
List of international cricket centuries by Kumar Sangakkara ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because, I've been working on this article for a while, and feel that it now meets all the FL criteria. It is based on several existing FLs such as List of international cricket centuries by Mahela Jayawardene and List of international cricket centuries by Rahul Dravid. Looking forward for your comments and suggestions. ASTRONOMYINERTIA ( TALK) 17:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC) reply
I have added an "Awards" section to the main article, in-line with a number of similar pages. Don't think the main article can accommodate another set of tables—a list of centuries—in this case. I hope this addresses the Vensatry's concern. ASTRONOMYINERTIA ( TALK) 07:10, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Zia Khan 23:18, 4 July 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
Quick comments
Zia Khan 20:09, 17 June 2012 (UTC) reply
More comments –
|
Support– Meets the criteria. Zia Khan 07:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from NapHit ( talk) 10:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
NapHit ( talk) 19:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Vensatry |
---|
Initial comments Since the subject has more than 40 centuries, I feel its fine to have a separate article (given the no. of centuries being more). Here's my review:
Oppose - The quality of prose is certainly not up to professional standards of writing and needs a complete re-write. The lead is not engaging as it just reads like a list of facts/achievements with no flow or continuation. — Vensatry (Ping me) 18:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC) reply |
I've been asked to have a look at the prose, and I'll try to get to it ASAP in the light of the length of time this nomination has been running. Bencherlite Talk 08:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Support subject to the disclaimer that I've done some work on the prose; apart from that, the list looks FL-worthy. I don't think that it's a 3(b) violation, given the current size of the Kumar Sangakkara article. Bencherlite Talk 23:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 03:26, 6 July 2012 [1].
List of international cricket centuries by Kumar Sangakkara ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because, I've been working on this article for a while, and feel that it now meets all the FL criteria. It is based on several existing FLs such as List of international cricket centuries by Mahela Jayawardene and List of international cricket centuries by Rahul Dravid. Looking forward for your comments and suggestions. ASTRONOMYINERTIA ( TALK) 17:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC) reply
I have added an "Awards" section to the main article, in-line with a number of similar pages. Don't think the main article can accommodate another set of tables—a list of centuries—in this case. I hope this addresses the Vensatry's concern. ASTRONOMYINERTIA ( TALK) 07:10, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Zia Khan 23:18, 4 July 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
Quick comments
Zia Khan 20:09, 17 June 2012 (UTC) reply
More comments –
|
Support– Meets the criteria. Zia Khan 07:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from NapHit ( talk) 10:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
NapHit ( talk) 19:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Vensatry |
---|
Initial comments Since the subject has more than 40 centuries, I feel its fine to have a separate article (given the no. of centuries being more). Here's my review:
Oppose - The quality of prose is certainly not up to professional standards of writing and needs a complete re-write. The lead is not engaging as it just reads like a list of facts/achievements with no flow or continuation. — Vensatry (Ping me) 18:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC) reply |
I've been asked to have a look at the prose, and I'll try to get to it ASAP in the light of the length of time this nomination has been running. Bencherlite Talk 08:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Support subject to the disclaimer that I've done some work on the prose; apart from that, the list looks FL-worthy. I don't think that it's a 3(b) violation, given the current size of the Kumar Sangakkara article. Bencherlite Talk 23:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC) reply