The list was not promoted by Matthewedwards 01:42, 10 May 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I believe this meets all the standards and requirements of an FL. It's been reviewed by another editor over at WP:MIL and assigned a B-class rating, and it is comprehensive, accurate and referenced. Cool3 ( talk) 18:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from KV5 |
---|
I would like to see these changes made and then return to review the article in that format. KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 19:34, 19 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Future comments will be made under this header once the above issues are handled. KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 19:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC) reply |
Resolved comments from
Chrishomingtang
|
---|
Comment
|
Comments
Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 06:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Brief comments from Hassocks (Two more added: Hassocks 5489 (tickets please!) 11:49, 30 April 2009 (UTC)) reply
Resolved comments from
Hassocks5489
|
---|
|
Hassocks 5489 (tickets please!) 12:49, 20 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 ( talk) |
---|
Comments from
Dabomb87 (
talk ·
contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Update. I have now, by popular demand, created a unified table and merged the remaining text into the lead section of the article. The lead is a bit long now, but I think it's acceptable and we didn't really lose any information in the transition. Cool3 ( talk) 02:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Matthewedwards 01:42, 10 May 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I believe this meets all the standards and requirements of an FL. It's been reviewed by another editor over at WP:MIL and assigned a B-class rating, and it is comprehensive, accurate and referenced. Cool3 ( talk) 18:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from KV5 |
---|
I would like to see these changes made and then return to review the article in that format. KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 19:34, 19 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Future comments will be made under this header once the above issues are handled. KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 19:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC) reply |
Resolved comments from
Chrishomingtang
|
---|
Comment
|
Comments
Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 06:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Brief comments from Hassocks (Two more added: Hassocks 5489 (tickets please!) 11:49, 30 April 2009 (UTC)) reply
Resolved comments from
Hassocks5489
|
---|
|
Hassocks 5489 (tickets please!) 12:49, 20 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 ( talk) |
---|
Comments from
Dabomb87 (
talk ·
contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Update. I have now, by popular demand, created a unified table and merged the remaining text into the lead section of the article. The lead is a bit long now, but I think it's acceptable and we didn't really lose any information in the transition. Cool3 ( talk) 02:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC) reply