The list was promoted by Dabomb87 00:09, 11 January 2011 [1].
List of battleships of the Ottoman Empire ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because this list has just recently passed a ACR under Wikiproject Military History and follows the established pattern for battleship related lists. (see List of battleships of Austria-Hungary, another FL of mine for a comparison.) Questions and comments are welcome. Thanks :) White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 10:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:02, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC) reply
|
Comment.
Same table issues that were at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of battlecruisers of the Royal Navy/archive1. To save a repeat conversation, a discussion can be found in my resolved comments there with detailed info on what the problem is (see also the list's talk page) and how to fix it. Thanks, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 22:36, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment. I think the inclusion criteria for the list should be mentioned on the page since it excluded the Ottoman battleship Mesudiye. While I understand your reasoning for excluding her, several notable naval publications such as Brassey's Naval Annual list her as a battleship. It would be extremely helpful to the reader to mention why she is not included on the page (because she was a coversion), despite the fact that several sources list her as a battleship. For example Lawrence Sondhaus's Naval warfare, 1815-1914 specifically states that she was converted into a pre-dreadnaught from a casemate type ship. XavierGreen ( talk) 05:55, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Giants2008 ( 27 and counting) 21:18, 29 November 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Quick comments –
|
Support Comments
Overall, the list is in good shape. I think you could have easily gotten away with a short table, but this list provides good list-like information as well as historical. I think the key is very helpful. Below are the issues that stood out to me.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 00:09, 11 January 2011 [1].
List of battleships of the Ottoman Empire ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because this list has just recently passed a ACR under Wikiproject Military History and follows the established pattern for battleship related lists. (see List of battleships of Austria-Hungary, another FL of mine for a comparison.) Questions and comments are welcome. Thanks :) White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 10:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:02, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC) reply
|
Comment.
Same table issues that were at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of battlecruisers of the Royal Navy/archive1. To save a repeat conversation, a discussion can be found in my resolved comments there with detailed info on what the problem is (see also the list's talk page) and how to fix it. Thanks, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 22:36, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment. I think the inclusion criteria for the list should be mentioned on the page since it excluded the Ottoman battleship Mesudiye. While I understand your reasoning for excluding her, several notable naval publications such as Brassey's Naval Annual list her as a battleship. It would be extremely helpful to the reader to mention why she is not included on the page (because she was a coversion), despite the fact that several sources list her as a battleship. For example Lawrence Sondhaus's Naval warfare, 1815-1914 specifically states that she was converted into a pre-dreadnaught from a casemate type ship. XavierGreen ( talk) 05:55, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Giants2008 ( 27 and counting) 21:18, 29 November 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Quick comments –
|
Support Comments
Overall, the list is in good shape. I think you could have easily gotten away with a short table, but this list provides good list-like information as well as historical. I think the key is very helpful. Below are the issues that stood out to me.