The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 17:35, 1 August 2012 [1].
List of battlecruisers of the United States ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am a little hesitant to nominate this list after the warm reception that List of battleships of Greece received, but I welcome discussion as to if this is really a stand-alone list or if it has sufficient items to qualify for FLC's unwritten length criteria or if it's really an article in list disguise. In format it matches the other WP:Ships FLs like List of battlecruisers of the Royal Navy or List of battlecruisers of Germany with a paragraph or two explaining the class history and the notable activities of the ships. I believe that it meets all the FL criteria as given. This is a co-nomination with Dank ( talk).-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 02:56, 17 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Comments – First off, great to see Dank helping out at an FLC. Welcome aboard!
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:04, 12 July 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments This isn't the venue for another 3b/minimum items discussion. As was said beforehand, it entirely depends on the list/article in question. This is just about sufficient to be a "list" as opposed to an article with a couple of tables in it, so it's fine to be here. I'll comment accordingly.
The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:05, 27 June 2012 (UTC) reply
|
Support - I've made a couple of small tweaks to the list; please check to make sure I haven't inadvertently changed any meanings. Overall a very nice little list, no concerns in my mind with regard to criteria 3.b. One minor comment, that does not change my support:
Other than this, everything looks great, so I'm happy to support. Dana boomer ( talk) 15:35, 18 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 17:35, 1 August 2012 [1].
List of battlecruisers of the United States ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am a little hesitant to nominate this list after the warm reception that List of battleships of Greece received, but I welcome discussion as to if this is really a stand-alone list or if it has sufficient items to qualify for FLC's unwritten length criteria or if it's really an article in list disguise. In format it matches the other WP:Ships FLs like List of battlecruisers of the Royal Navy or List of battlecruisers of Germany with a paragraph or two explaining the class history and the notable activities of the ships. I believe that it meets all the FL criteria as given. This is a co-nomination with Dank ( talk).-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 02:56, 17 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Comments – First off, great to see Dank helping out at an FLC. Welcome aboard!
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:04, 12 July 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments This isn't the venue for another 3b/minimum items discussion. As was said beforehand, it entirely depends on the list/article in question. This is just about sufficient to be a "list" as opposed to an article with a couple of tables in it, so it's fine to be here. I'll comment accordingly.
The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:05, 27 June 2012 (UTC) reply
|
Support - I've made a couple of small tweaks to the list; please check to make sure I haven't inadvertently changed any meanings. Overall a very nice little list, no concerns in my mind with regard to criteria 3.b. One minor comment, that does not change my support:
Other than this, everything looks great, so I'm happy to support. Dana boomer ( talk) 15:35, 18 July 2012 (UTC) reply