The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 12:03, 3 January 2013 [1].
List of awards and nominations received by Vidya Balan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating the article for FLC because i think it meets Featured list criteria A Great User ✉ ✉ 09:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Quick oppose
{{
Cite web}}
A Great User
✉
✉
12:12, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
reply
work=31 December 2012
?
The Rambling Man (
talk)
11:17, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
reply
date=31 December 2012
A Great User
✉
✉
06:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
replyThat's a quick five-minute run through. A long way to go. The Rambling Man ( talk) 11:21, 31 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Also, the lead is full of issues, you need to get it copyedited by a native English speaker:
This is the lead alone. I haven't even dared read the rest of the article apart from the look at the refs..... The Rambling Man ( talk) 13:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC) reply
I just realised that there was also an unclosed PR by the nom, which needed to be handled first. I therefore withdraw this nomination in favour of having a PR first before going across to FLC. If any of the reviewers here can do it, it would be good.
TheOriginalSoni (
talk)
08:19, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
reply
Strong oppose this list is nowhere near featured standard. Going through the prose there are basic issues such as "She debuted in 2005 film..." That's not grammatically correct. The majority of that second paragraph is the same. The tables don't meet MOS:DTT, references should be placed after punctuation not straight after a word. Even the alt text doesn't make sense: "An Indian actress wearing a black Saaree with trophy holding in her hand." This needs a thorough copyedit by a native English speaker, as the prose is simply not good enough now. I suggest withdrawing this list as there is no way this list can be promoted within the timescale of this nom. NapHit ( talk) 14:23, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Please, please ask someone to copyedit this for you. In one second I spotted "Actress.[4][5] (2011) went to give her fifth " in the lead prose... what?! I'm also seeing WP:DASH violations in some reference titles, some badly and/or inconsistently formatted dates in the references.... honestly, withdraw the list, get it looked at properly, and bring it back in a month or so... The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:23, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Strong oppose Greatuser may be "damb" sure about the list; however, I can't stress enough on the large number of grammatical errors in the lead alone. The first paragraph has been completely lifted from Vidya Balan's article. Moreover, several of the sources are unreliable (Pinkvilla, OneIndia, Indicine, Glamsham...to name a few); also, the references haven't been formatted properly. In short, the list has a long, long, long way to go before it meets the featured criteria. -- smarojit (buzz me) 04:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 12:03, 3 January 2013 [1].
List of awards and nominations received by Vidya Balan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating the article for FLC because i think it meets Featured list criteria A Great User ✉ ✉ 09:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Quick oppose
{{
Cite web}}
A Great User
✉
✉
12:12, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
reply
work=31 December 2012
?
The Rambling Man (
talk)
11:17, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
reply
date=31 December 2012
A Great User
✉
✉
06:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
replyThat's a quick five-minute run through. A long way to go. The Rambling Man ( talk) 11:21, 31 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Also, the lead is full of issues, you need to get it copyedited by a native English speaker:
This is the lead alone. I haven't even dared read the rest of the article apart from the look at the refs..... The Rambling Man ( talk) 13:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC) reply
I just realised that there was also an unclosed PR by the nom, which needed to be handled first. I therefore withdraw this nomination in favour of having a PR first before going across to FLC. If any of the reviewers here can do it, it would be good.
TheOriginalSoni (
talk)
08:19, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
reply
Strong oppose this list is nowhere near featured standard. Going through the prose there are basic issues such as "She debuted in 2005 film..." That's not grammatically correct. The majority of that second paragraph is the same. The tables don't meet MOS:DTT, references should be placed after punctuation not straight after a word. Even the alt text doesn't make sense: "An Indian actress wearing a black Saaree with trophy holding in her hand." This needs a thorough copyedit by a native English speaker, as the prose is simply not good enough now. I suggest withdrawing this list as there is no way this list can be promoted within the timescale of this nom. NapHit ( talk) 14:23, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Please, please ask someone to copyedit this for you. In one second I spotted "Actress.[4][5] (2011) went to give her fifth " in the lead prose... what?! I'm also seeing WP:DASH violations in some reference titles, some badly and/or inconsistently formatted dates in the references.... honestly, withdraw the list, get it looked at properly, and bring it back in a month or so... The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:23, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Strong oppose Greatuser may be "damb" sure about the list; however, I can't stress enough on the large number of grammatical errors in the lead alone. The first paragraph has been completely lifted from Vidya Balan's article. Moreover, several of the sources are unreliable (Pinkvilla, OneIndia, Indicine, Glamsham...to name a few); also, the references haven't been formatted properly. In short, the list has a long, long, long way to go before it meets the featured criteria. -- smarojit (buzz me) 04:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply