The list was not promoted by Hahc21 10:03, 25 March 2013 (UTC) [1]. reply
List of accolades received by Lagaan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this list for featured list because I feel that I have significantly improved the quality and it meets all 6 FL criteria. Surge_Elec ( talk) 07:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Oppose
— Vensatry (Ping me) 12:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Oppose - suggest the nominator follows Vensatry's advice. At a glance I can see several MOS issues (e.g. WP:CONTEXTLINK, WP:HASH, MOS:REF, WP:DASH), grammar issues (e.g. "in Time magazines' list"), not to mention those issues raised above. It's a good framework for an FLC, but it needs a thorough copyedit. The Rambling Man ( talk) 10:19, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Hahc21 10:03, 25 March 2013 (UTC) [1]. reply
List of accolades received by Lagaan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this list for featured list because I feel that I have significantly improved the quality and it meets all 6 FL criteria. Surge_Elec ( talk) 07:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Oppose
— Vensatry (Ping me) 12:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Oppose - suggest the nominator follows Vensatry's advice. At a glance I can see several MOS issues (e.g. WP:CONTEXTLINK, WP:HASH, MOS:REF, WP:DASH), grammar issues (e.g. "in Time magazines' list"), not to mention those issues raised above. It's a good framework for an FLC, but it needs a thorough copyedit. The Rambling Man ( talk) 10:19, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply