The list was promoted by SchroCat 08:47, 13 June 2014 (UTC) [1]. reply
List of accolades received by American Hustle ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Myself and Cowlibob are nominating this for featured list because it meets the six criteria for a featured list: prose, comprehensiveness, structure, style and stability. The article is well written and features professional standards of writing. The lead provides a description of American Hustle, the venues in which it was shown, the nominations and awards which it has received, and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. The article comprehensively addresses all of the nominations and awards that American Hustle received with proper citation. The length of the list is appropriate for the subject, provides suitable supplementary information to the main article and does not duplicate information. The list is easy to navigate through and includes helpful section headings. The list fully complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour. There are no red-linked items. The picture of Jennifer Lawrence on the red carpet at the 70th Golden Globe Awards is freely licensed and helps to illustrate the article. The article is stable. The content has not changed significantly during the last few weeks. Corvoe (speak to me) 14:19, 21 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments some quick ones while I wait for my flight...
The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:40, 1 May 2014 (UTC) reply
|
Comments by Betty Logan I think I can broadly support this, but here a few observations:
Resolved comments from — Vensatry (ping) 14:11, 3 June 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from —
Vensatry
(ping)
— Vensatry (ping) 18:42, 26 May 2014 (UTC) reply
In the table, American Hustle isn't linked at all. Also add links for recipients who don't have a page too. Red-links aren't a problem. —
Vensatry
(ping)
04:03, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
reply
|
Resolved comments from KRIMUK90 ✉ 14:10, 12 June 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from Krimuk90
-- KRIMUK90 ✉ 16:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC) reply @ Krimuk90:The lead changes are implemented. Fixed all the reference formatting I think. Deadline.com and Empire are magazines. THR and Variety are trade newspapers so can be italicised. Nice suggestion with having a separate column for references, will definitely consider doing that for future articles. Cowlibob ( talk) 09:26, 12 June 2014 (UTC) reply
|
The list was promoted by SchroCat 08:47, 13 June 2014 (UTC) [1]. reply
List of accolades received by American Hustle ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Myself and Cowlibob are nominating this for featured list because it meets the six criteria for a featured list: prose, comprehensiveness, structure, style and stability. The article is well written and features professional standards of writing. The lead provides a description of American Hustle, the venues in which it was shown, the nominations and awards which it has received, and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. The article comprehensively addresses all of the nominations and awards that American Hustle received with proper citation. The length of the list is appropriate for the subject, provides suitable supplementary information to the main article and does not duplicate information. The list is easy to navigate through and includes helpful section headings. The list fully complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour. There are no red-linked items. The picture of Jennifer Lawrence on the red carpet at the 70th Golden Globe Awards is freely licensed and helps to illustrate the article. The article is stable. The content has not changed significantly during the last few weeks. Corvoe (speak to me) 14:19, 21 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments some quick ones while I wait for my flight...
The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:40, 1 May 2014 (UTC) reply
|
Comments by Betty Logan I think I can broadly support this, but here a few observations:
Resolved comments from — Vensatry (ping) 14:11, 3 June 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from —
Vensatry
(ping)
— Vensatry (ping) 18:42, 26 May 2014 (UTC) reply
In the table, American Hustle isn't linked at all. Also add links for recipients who don't have a page too. Red-links aren't a problem. —
Vensatry
(ping)
04:03, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
reply
|
Resolved comments from KRIMUK90 ✉ 14:10, 12 June 2014 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments from Krimuk90
-- KRIMUK90 ✉ 16:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC) reply @ Krimuk90:The lead changes are implemented. Fixed all the reference formatting I think. Deadline.com and Empire are magazines. THR and Variety are trade newspapers so can be italicised. Nice suggestion with having a separate column for references, will definitely consider doing that for future articles. Cowlibob ( talk) 09:26, 12 June 2014 (UTC) reply
|