The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 23:34, 13 June 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
The first time I've nominated a transportation list, so be gentle. Note that there's been a debate about including the row of images on the right. Reviewer input on that issue would be helpful. Should they be there? Geraldk ( talk) 22:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from
Chrishomingtang
|
---|
Comment
— Chris! c t 02:35, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply
|
CommentsSupport from Hassocks5489.
A pleasing and attractively designed list. I am close to being able to support.
Resolved comments from
Hassocks5489
|
---|
|
Thanks for your work on this list. Hassocks 5489 (tickets please!) 12:32, 5 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from KV5 |
---|
Just a few comments here, but on first glance, the list is extremely pleasing aesthetically and does an excellent job of conveying information in an efficient style.
Hope these comments help. KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 02:03, 6 June 2009 (UTC) reply
|
Strong Support from KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 12:35, 6 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment You've got a lot of dash problems in the table. Whenever the separated elements have internal spaces (e.g. Addison Road–Seat Pleasant), then there should be spaces around the dashes. Dabomb87 ( talk) 14:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 ( talk) 20:51, 13 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 ( talk) |
---|
Comments from
Dabomb87 (
talk ·
contribs)
talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 14:08, 8 June 2009 (UTC) |
Sources look good. Dabomb87 ( talk) 14:08, 8 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from SRE.K.A.L.24
|
---|
Comment - It would be nice if you could talk more about the history of the lines and stations, like in List of Vancouver SkyTrain stations. -- [[ SRE.K.A.L.| L.A.K.ERS]] 23:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC) reply
More comments from -- [[ SRE.K.A.L.| L.A.K.ERS]] [c]
-- [[ SRE.K.A.L.| L.A.K.ERS]] 14:32, 8 June 2009 (UTC) reply |
The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 23:34, 13 June 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
The first time I've nominated a transportation list, so be gentle. Note that there's been a debate about including the row of images on the right. Reviewer input on that issue would be helpful. Should they be there? Geraldk ( talk) 22:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from
Chrishomingtang
|
---|
Comment
— Chris! c t 02:35, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply
|
CommentsSupport from Hassocks5489.
A pleasing and attractively designed list. I am close to being able to support.
Resolved comments from
Hassocks5489
|
---|
|
Thanks for your work on this list. Hassocks 5489 (tickets please!) 12:32, 5 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from KV5 |
---|
Just a few comments here, but on first glance, the list is extremely pleasing aesthetically and does an excellent job of conveying information in an efficient style.
Hope these comments help. KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 02:03, 6 June 2009 (UTC) reply
|
Strong Support from KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 12:35, 6 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment You've got a lot of dash problems in the table. Whenever the separated elements have internal spaces (e.g. Addison Road–Seat Pleasant), then there should be spaces around the dashes. Dabomb87 ( talk) 14:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 ( talk) 20:51, 13 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 ( talk) |
---|
Comments from
Dabomb87 (
talk ·
contribs)
talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 14:08, 8 June 2009 (UTC) |
Sources look good. Dabomb87 ( talk) 14:08, 8 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from SRE.K.A.L.24
|
---|
Comment - It would be nice if you could talk more about the history of the lines and stations, like in List of Vancouver SkyTrain stations. -- [[ SRE.K.A.L.| L.A.K.ERS]] 23:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC) reply
More comments from -- [[ SRE.K.A.L.| L.A.K.ERS]] [c]
-- [[ SRE.K.A.L.| L.A.K.ERS]] 14:32, 8 June 2009 (UTC) reply |