The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 01:46, 6 December 2008 [1].
I am nominating this list for featured list status as I believe it meets all of the current FLC criteria. The entire article is well sourced using reliable references. The lead is comprehensive and provides the relevant details normally found in a chapter list, with the appropriate opening sentence and an appropriate image in the upper right corner. The list itself is well-formatted, comprehensive, and complete. The individual volume summaries are of a reasonable length for 200 page volumes, with all summaries around 300 words each. It has been extensively peer reviewed, both through its own talk page and in the formal PR process, and all issues brought up have been addressed. -- AnmaFinotera ( talk · contribs) 15:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC) replyComments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs)
I'll comment more later (I can take only so much manga!). Dabomb87 ( talk) 20:17, 27 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Support, Read the summaries and they were easy to understand. Sources are okay. Tintor2 ( talk) 19:31, 28 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment Is "afterward" the word they use, or should it be "afterword"? The latter is more typical for an essay-like piece of writing by the author. But maybe afterward is being used instead of "epilogue"? Dillypickle ( talk) 15:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 01:46, 6 December 2008 [1].
I am nominating this list for featured list status as I believe it meets all of the current FLC criteria. The entire article is well sourced using reliable references. The lead is comprehensive and provides the relevant details normally found in a chapter list, with the appropriate opening sentence and an appropriate image in the upper right corner. The list itself is well-formatted, comprehensive, and complete. The individual volume summaries are of a reasonable length for 200 page volumes, with all summaries around 300 words each. It has been extensively peer reviewed, both through its own talk page and in the formal PR process, and all issues brought up have been addressed. -- AnmaFinotera ( talk · contribs) 15:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC) replyComments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs)
I'll comment more later (I can take only so much manga!). Dabomb87 ( talk) 20:17, 27 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Support, Read the summaries and they were easy to understand. Sources are okay. Tintor2 ( talk) 19:31, 28 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment Is "afterward" the word they use, or should it be "afterword"? The latter is more typical for an essay-like piece of writing by the author. But maybe afterward is being used instead of "epilogue"? Dillypickle ( talk) 15:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply