The list was not promoted by Matthewedwards 01:45, 13 March 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
Another episode list for your consideration. A minor warning: the contents of this list are quite disturbing. To quote one reviewer, " It's dark, the fetish angle has the potential to make folks very uncomfortable, and it's violent." Now that I've given fair warning, good luck! ɳOCTURNEɳOIR ( t • c ) 03:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC) reply
|
Oppose, as I can't get past a single summary without finding these kinds of prose issues and I haven't even read past ep4. -- Goodraise ( talk) 14:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs) The writing needs work, and I'm not even referring to grammar or conciseness. My main concern is that readers will find it hard to follow what is going on. Find someone who has never read the article. Ask them to look at the it and identify/fix the ambiguities.
In any event, I withdraw this nomination. This clearly needs more time and a few more eyes before it even has hope of passing. I need to spend some time and reframe this entire episode list, as the ideas and concepts behind the series are truly quite strange for those who have not watched it. Thanks for the comments, and apologies for the premature nomination. Further comments can either be dropped at my talk page or at the talk page of the list. ɳOCTURNEɳOIR ( t • c) 19:40, 12 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by Matthewedwards 01:45, 13 March 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
Another episode list for your consideration. A minor warning: the contents of this list are quite disturbing. To quote one reviewer, " It's dark, the fetish angle has the potential to make folks very uncomfortable, and it's violent." Now that I've given fair warning, good luck! ɳOCTURNEɳOIR ( t • c ) 03:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC) reply
|
Oppose, as I can't get past a single summary without finding these kinds of prose issues and I haven't even read past ep4. -- Goodraise ( talk) 14:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs) The writing needs work, and I'm not even referring to grammar or conciseness. My main concern is that readers will find it hard to follow what is going on. Find someone who has never read the article. Ask them to look at the it and identify/fix the ambiguities.
In any event, I withdraw this nomination. This clearly needs more time and a few more eyes before it even has hope of passing. I need to spend some time and reframe this entire episode list, as the ideas and concepts behind the series are truly quite strange for those who have not watched it. Thanks for the comments, and apologies for the premature nomination. Further comments can either be dropped at my talk page or at the talk page of the list. ɳOCTURNEɳOIR ( t • c) 19:40, 12 March 2009 (UTC) reply