The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 08:17, 31 January 2009 [1].
This list has been comprehensively referenced and I believe is now ready for promotion. As per the vexed issue of sortability, that has been debated and the final conclusion appears to be that there is little practicality in creating a list 25 fields wide and 5 fields long. Please see Ling.Nut's prototype and Nergaal's test for an idea of what a sortable list would look like, and keep in mind that any future list would likely be wider than either of them. Serendi pod ous 18:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Done. The citation for this list is very complicated, and actually operates in two dimensions. :-) For instance, the main citation above the name for each planet gives the planet's axial tilt, but the main citation above the name for each satellite (except the Moon) does not. However, the citation for the axial tilts of all the moons is given in the Moon-Axial tilt reference along the side. Also, sometimes an accurate value for a moon's axial tilt is known (see Ganymede) and in that case the citation overrides the "blanket citation". I hope that made sense. Serendi pod ous 02:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs)
Sources look good. Dabomb87 ( talk) 17:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC) reply
format=PDF
added to it.Note to all: a new large KBO has just been announced, and it has had to be inserted into the lower table. It will be a short while before all the necessary calculations are completed. Serendi pod ous 15:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 08:17, 31 January 2009 [1].
This list has been comprehensively referenced and I believe is now ready for promotion. As per the vexed issue of sortability, that has been debated and the final conclusion appears to be that there is little practicality in creating a list 25 fields wide and 5 fields long. Please see Ling.Nut's prototype and Nergaal's test for an idea of what a sortable list would look like, and keep in mind that any future list would likely be wider than either of them. Serendi pod ous 18:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Done. The citation for this list is very complicated, and actually operates in two dimensions. :-) For instance, the main citation above the name for each planet gives the planet's axial tilt, but the main citation above the name for each satellite (except the Moon) does not. However, the citation for the axial tilts of all the moons is given in the Moon-Axial tilt reference along the side. Also, sometimes an accurate value for a moon's axial tilt is known (see Ganymede) and in that case the citation overrides the "blanket citation". I hope that made sense. Serendi pod ous 02:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs)
Sources look good. Dabomb87 ( talk) 17:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC) reply
format=PDF
added to it.Note to all: a new large KBO has just been announced, and it has had to be inserted into the lower table. It will be a short while before all the necessary calculations are completed. Serendi pod ous 15:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC) reply