The list was promoted by SchroCat via FACBot ( talk) 00:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC) [1]. reply
List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Bedfordshire ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Twelve Lists of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in British counties are FLs. Almost all were passed in 2006-8, and in my view the fields chosen were not always the most helpful for readers. I have deleted designation date as this will be of interest to very few readers, and added columns for the Natural England information pages (which were previously references), photographs and access. The other designations column was added before I started working on the article. Dudley Miles ( talk) 09:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from Rodw Another interesting list - just a few comments/questions:
Most of these are fairly minor and shouldn't be too difficult to fix.— Rod talk 09:12, 29 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments
NapHit ( talk) 23:55, 29 December 2015 (UTC) Support List meets the criteria. Great work. NapHit ( talk) 14:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Support – At first reading I was surprised to see external links from the last column to citations, but this makes good sense and is easier for the reader to follow (one click rather than the two clicks if the links were banished to the references section). Moreover there are ample precedents for external links from tables in Featured Lists on SSSIs ( here, here and here). Very pleased to support the promotion of this page to FL. Meets all the criteria, in my view. – Tim riley talk 12:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by SchroCat via FACBot ( talk) 00:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC) [1]. reply
List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Bedfordshire ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Twelve Lists of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in British counties are FLs. Almost all were passed in 2006-8, and in my view the fields chosen were not always the most helpful for readers. I have deleted designation date as this will be of interest to very few readers, and added columns for the Natural England information pages (which were previously references), photographs and access. The other designations column was added before I started working on the article. Dudley Miles ( talk) 09:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments from Rodw Another interesting list - just a few comments/questions:
Most of these are fairly minor and shouldn't be too difficult to fix.— Rod talk 09:12, 29 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments
NapHit ( talk) 23:55, 29 December 2015 (UTC) Support List meets the criteria. Great work. NapHit ( talk) 14:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Support – At first reading I was surprised to see external links from the last column to citations, but this makes good sense and is easier for the reader to follow (one click rather than the two clicks if the links were banished to the references section). Moreover there are ample precedents for external links from tables in Featured Lists on SSSIs ( here, here and here). Very pleased to support the promotion of this page to FL. Meets all the criteria, in my view. – Tim riley talk 12:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC) reply