The list was promoted 07:02, 6 April 2008.
I believe the list has finally reached a point that it's well formatted, and easily accessable for changes. Information that needs to be cited is. Gman124 ( talk) 00:33, 22 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment: We have decided on consensus that there can be no non-free/fair-use media on lists. Please remove those (completely unnecessary anyway) logos from the article immediately. I'd even say logos like those in no way satisfy fair-use criterion on Wikipedia and should be deleted. The lead is too stubby; combine the small paragraphs into bigger ones that read well together. Why don't you include the image in this article in the lead? indopug ( talk) 05:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment: I would go with Indopug's comments as well. Another idea for a suitable image could be
the complete series boxset, although you have to remember to include the fair use rationale.
ISD (
talk) 14:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comments
That's it for now.
-- ṃ•α•Ł•ṭ•ʰ•Ə•Щ• @ 20:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Support All concerns addressed. Meets the criteria. One thing though, the column width for the writers is very wide, even wider than the title's itself. It'd look more presentable if the directors' and writers' columns were the same width and <br /> the second writer onto another line. It's not that big of a deal though. -- ṃ•α•Ł•ṭ•ʰ•Ə•Щ• @ 17:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted 07:02, 6 April 2008.
I believe the list has finally reached a point that it's well formatted, and easily accessable for changes. Information that needs to be cited is. Gman124 ( talk) 00:33, 22 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment: We have decided on consensus that there can be no non-free/fair-use media on lists. Please remove those (completely unnecessary anyway) logos from the article immediately. I'd even say logos like those in no way satisfy fair-use criterion on Wikipedia and should be deleted. The lead is too stubby; combine the small paragraphs into bigger ones that read well together. Why don't you include the image in this article in the lead? indopug ( talk) 05:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment: I would go with Indopug's comments as well. Another idea for a suitable image could be
the complete series boxset, although you have to remember to include the fair use rationale.
ISD (
talk) 14:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comments
That's it for now.
-- ṃ•α•Ł•ṭ•ʰ•Ə•Щ• @ 20:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Support All concerns addressed. Meets the criteria. One thing though, the column width for the writers is very wide, even wider than the title's itself. It'd look more presentable if the directors' and writers' columns were the same width and <br /> the second writer onto another line. It's not that big of a deal though. -- ṃ•α•Ł•ṭ•ʰ•Ə•Щ• @ 17:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply