Comment -- I'd be a little more comfortable supporting if the state acronyms are defined somewhere in the page.
=Nichalp«Talk»= 06:29, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
Has been addressed.
Phoenix2 04:36, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
Would also like to see jguk's colour coding issue resolved.
=Nichalp«Talk»= 06:17, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
The image
Image:Paulmartin1.jpg is used under "fair use" and "Canadian crown copyright", but neither set of rules has been followed. There is no source information, and no fair use rationale.
Comments I agree with Nichalp about expanding the acronyms for the provinces, which aren't familiar to people outside North America. Also some explanation of the red and blue colours on the left hand side of the table would be useful. A brief description in the introduction about the significance of the prime ministership of Canada would also help: I think they are heads of government and have the most senior political post in Canada (with the GG being obliged by constitutional practice to accept any advice given by the PM). Is this right? Is the Time almanack the best reference, rather than say an official website of the Canadian PM? A link to the latter would be useful regardless,
jguk19:02, 23 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Additional link and reference have been provided.
Phoenix2 04:36, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
as to the red a blue on the left side designating the party, is it neccessary with the seperate party column?
User:Say1988
I think it's OK as is, if you want to change it go ahead, welcome to Wikipedia.
Phoenix2 18:34, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
Comment -- I'd be a little more comfortable supporting if the state acronyms are defined somewhere in the page.
=Nichalp«Talk»= 06:29, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
Has been addressed.
Phoenix2 04:36, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
Would also like to see jguk's colour coding issue resolved.
=Nichalp«Talk»= 06:17, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
The image
Image:Paulmartin1.jpg is used under "fair use" and "Canadian crown copyright", but neither set of rules has been followed. There is no source information, and no fair use rationale.
Comments I agree with Nichalp about expanding the acronyms for the provinces, which aren't familiar to people outside North America. Also some explanation of the red and blue colours on the left hand side of the table would be useful. A brief description in the introduction about the significance of the prime ministership of Canada would also help: I think they are heads of government and have the most senior political post in Canada (with the GG being obliged by constitutional practice to accept any advice given by the PM). Is this right? Is the Time almanack the best reference, rather than say an official website of the Canadian PM? A link to the latter would be useful regardless,
jguk19:02, 23 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Additional link and reference have been provided.
Phoenix2 04:36, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
as to the red a blue on the left side designating the party, is it neccessary with the seperate party column?
User:Say1988
I think it's OK as is, if you want to change it go ahead, welcome to Wikipedia.
Phoenix2 18:34, August 28, 2005 (UTC)