The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 22:32, 20 June 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I think it meets the criteria. I have spent a lot of time and made a lot of edits to it to bring it up to where it is. Kumioko ( talk) 02:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Several of my comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Medal of Honor recipients (Veracruz)/archive1 apply here. Edit as necessary. Dabomb87 ( talk) 00:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC) reply
We don't start lists with "this is a list" in the prose part anymore. — Rlevse • Talk • 11:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 ( talk) 01:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 ( talk) |
---|
Comments from
Dabomb87Â (
talk ·
contribs) I'll be back for more.
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 ( talk) 01:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC) reply
This is my first time reviewing these "medal of honor" lists and I am very disappointed. I felt like I went back in time. I see a vertical navigational template on top and many general references with no inline citations for the table. If there were one or two general references, I'd understand, but five? That's a little too much.-- Crzy cheetah 06:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC) reply
(Undent) If you want me to pick one way to identify the service thats fine, but whatever we decide I will go and change it for all the Medal of Honor lists so they are all consistent. Most of them use [Service] vice [U.S. Service] so I would recommend sticking with [Service] since the Medal of Honor is only granted to US service members (except for the tombs of Unknown soldiers for a couple countries). Also, in regards to the nowrap thing, the Vera cruz and iwo jima lists are also featured and use this template so see if you have the problem on them as well. I do not see what you are seeing on my computer so I have to conclude that its at least possible that its something to do with the settings on your computer. -- Kumioko ( talk) 13:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 22:32, 20 June 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I think it meets the criteria. I have spent a lot of time and made a lot of edits to it to bring it up to where it is. Kumioko ( talk) 02:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Several of my comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Medal of Honor recipients (Veracruz)/archive1 apply here. Edit as necessary. Dabomb87 ( talk) 00:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC) reply
We don't start lists with "this is a list" in the prose part anymore. — Rlevse • Talk • 11:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 ( talk) 01:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 ( talk) |
---|
Comments from
Dabomb87Â (
talk ·
contribs) I'll be back for more.
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 ( talk) 01:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC) reply
This is my first time reviewing these "medal of honor" lists and I am very disappointed. I felt like I went back in time. I see a vertical navigational template on top and many general references with no inline citations for the table. If there were one or two general references, I'd understand, but five? That's a little too much.-- Crzy cheetah 06:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC) reply
(Undent) If you want me to pick one way to identify the service thats fine, but whatever we decide I will go and change it for all the Medal of Honor lists so they are all consistent. Most of them use [Service] vice [U.S. Service] so I would recommend sticking with [Service] since the Medal of Honor is only granted to US service members (except for the tombs of Unknown soldiers for a couple countries). Also, in regards to the nowrap thing, the Vera cruz and iwo jima lists are also featured and use this template so see if you have the problem on them as well. I do not see what you are seeing on my computer so I have to conclude that its at least possible that its something to do with the settings on your computer. -- Kumioko ( talk) 13:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC) reply
|