The list was not promoted by User:Gimmetrow 16:51, 3 August 2008 [1].
I am nominating this list, which I have recently updated from a bulleted text list with no formatting. I have reviewed the FLC criteria with it and believe that it meets the criteria. Thanks for your consideration. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 22:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 23:30, 23 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Fixed comments |
---|
|
-- KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 15:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC) reply
(→)That's what I suggested at first. Go ahead!-- Crzy cheetah 04:33, 2 August 2008 (UTC) reply
--
Crzy
cheetah 08:10, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
I feel that there are some assumptions of bad faith in this review. This editor and i have conflicted previously in an FLC review and I feel that this is being used as an opportunity for an argument rather than an honest review.
KV5 •
Squawk box •
Fight on! 18:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comments
Matthewedwards ( talk • contribs • email) 07:41, 3 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Gimmetrow 16:51, 3 August 2008 [1].
I am nominating this list, which I have recently updated from a bulleted text list with no formatting. I have reviewed the FLC criteria with it and believe that it meets the criteria. Thanks for your consideration. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 22:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Gary King ( talk) 23:30, 23 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Fixed comments |
---|
|
-- KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 15:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC) reply
(→)That's what I suggested at first. Go ahead!-- Crzy cheetah 04:33, 2 August 2008 (UTC) reply
--
Crzy
cheetah 08:10, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
I feel that there are some assumptions of bad faith in this review. This editor and i have conflicted previously in an FLC review and I feel that this is being used as an opportunity for an argument rather than an honest review.
KV5 •
Squawk box •
Fight on! 18:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comments
Matthewedwards ( talk • contribs • email) 07:41, 3 August 2008 (UTC) reply