The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 21:41, 24 September 2010 [1].
List of One Piece manga volumes ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because "we need more FLCs!" [2] The last FLC failed because of a reviewer taking some issues with the prose with which I simply disagreed and therefore did not address. Please take the time to read his arguments and state whether or not you agree with him. Thanks. Good raise 10:58, 23 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Oppose - As it currently is as the issue from the last FAC hasn't been addressed. As I said last time, if someone else uninvolved with that particular issue or other manga FLCs disagrees with me, then I would drop it. They haven't though that still stands.
In that regard, listing the first publication date for every volume isn't necessary for Madman, although and last (the latter of which has yet to be announced) is. Furthermore its by language, not region. While it doesn't apply here specifically, other divisions do divide by region, such as video games and in that case it would be important to note Madman's first publication for each and every one if we divided it as such. It would also be notable to make the publications if Madman, took its cue from 4kids and altered the manga to come out with their own unique publication style.
The bottom line is I'm not disputing with you that VIZ by virtue of being first has more importance. I'm saying that status doesn't amount to all but ignoring Madman save for one lone sentence. 陣 内 Jinnai 05:08, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply
"I'm not disputing ... that VIZ ... has more importance. I'm saying that status doesn't amount to all but ignoring Madman save for one lone sentence." – So, you're saying Madman Entertainment's releases should be covered less deeply than those of Viz Media, but in more than one sentence, right? Why? Their releases are already covered more deeply than all non-English, non-Japanese releases combined and equally deep as the releases of Gollancz Manga. Why do their releases merit deeper coverage? They're only selling Viz's adaptation under a different name. [4] If anything, they're already given more attention then they're due. Good raise 12:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 07:33, 3 September 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC) reply |
The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 21:41, 24 September 2010 [1].
List of One Piece manga volumes ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because "we need more FLCs!" [2] The last FLC failed because of a reviewer taking some issues with the prose with which I simply disagreed and therefore did not address. Please take the time to read his arguments and state whether or not you agree with him. Thanks. Good raise 10:58, 23 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Oppose - As it currently is as the issue from the last FAC hasn't been addressed. As I said last time, if someone else uninvolved with that particular issue or other manga FLCs disagrees with me, then I would drop it. They haven't though that still stands.
In that regard, listing the first publication date for every volume isn't necessary for Madman, although and last (the latter of which has yet to be announced) is. Furthermore its by language, not region. While it doesn't apply here specifically, other divisions do divide by region, such as video games and in that case it would be important to note Madman's first publication for each and every one if we divided it as such. It would also be notable to make the publications if Madman, took its cue from 4kids and altered the manga to come out with their own unique publication style.
The bottom line is I'm not disputing with you that VIZ by virtue of being first has more importance. I'm saying that status doesn't amount to all but ignoring Madman save for one lone sentence. 陣 内 Jinnai 05:08, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply
"I'm not disputing ... that VIZ ... has more importance. I'm saying that status doesn't amount to all but ignoring Madman save for one lone sentence." – So, you're saying Madman Entertainment's releases should be covered less deeply than those of Viz Media, but in more than one sentence, right? Why? Their releases are already covered more deeply than all non-English, non-Japanese releases combined and equally deep as the releases of Gollancz Manga. Why do their releases merit deeper coverage? They're only selling Viz's adaptation under a different name. [4] If anything, they're already given more attention then they're due. Good raise 12:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 07:33, 3 September 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC) reply |