The list was not promoted 21:59, 24 May 2008 [1].
I am nominating this list as I believe it meets all of the FLC criteria. Everything is well sourced with reliable references, the lead is comprehensive and provides the relevant details normally found in a chapter list with an appropriate image in the upper right corner. The list itself is well-formatted, comprehensive, and complete. The individual volume summaries are of a reasonable length to be summaries of 200 page books, with all but two under 300 words. It has been informally peer reviewed and all suggestions implemented, so I believe it is now ready. Collectonian ( talk) 03:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC) reply
That's a start. I think most of these would have been picked up a peer review which, incidentally, now has an active collaboration from a number of editors to ensure PRs don't go beyond three days without comment. The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:29, 28 April 2008 (UTC) reply
With words like "wikibonking" (=?) on this page, how could I resist commenting...? Some minor issues in the Lead, but the plot synopses need a lot of work. I've given detailed feedback on just the first one, below. But I suggest you deal with the issue I've bolded first, as it may make others redundant:
Sorry for opposing -- Dweller ( talk) 09:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC) reply
I would like to withdraw this FLC. Please close. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 07:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted 21:59, 24 May 2008 [1].
I am nominating this list as I believe it meets all of the FLC criteria. Everything is well sourced with reliable references, the lead is comprehensive and provides the relevant details normally found in a chapter list with an appropriate image in the upper right corner. The list itself is well-formatted, comprehensive, and complete. The individual volume summaries are of a reasonable length to be summaries of 200 page books, with all but two under 300 words. It has been informally peer reviewed and all suggestions implemented, so I believe it is now ready. Collectonian ( talk) 03:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC) reply
That's a start. I think most of these would have been picked up a peer review which, incidentally, now has an active collaboration from a number of editors to ensure PRs don't go beyond three days without comment. The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:29, 28 April 2008 (UTC) reply
With words like "wikibonking" (=?) on this page, how could I resist commenting...? Some minor issues in the Lead, but the plot synopses need a lot of work. I've given detailed feedback on just the first one, below. But I suggest you deal with the issue I've bolded first, as it may make others redundant:
Sorry for opposing -- Dweller ( talk) 09:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC) reply
I would like to withdraw this FLC. Please close. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 07:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC) reply