The list was promoted by Giants2008 23:08, 13 February 2012 [1].
List of Liverpool F.C. players (fewer than 25 appearances) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
My current nom has three supports and now actionable opposes or comments, so should be alright nomming this. i feel the list meets the criteria, I know there are a lot of redlinks and I will endeavour to remove these over the course of the nomination. Cheers NapHit ( talk) 17:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Lemonade51 ( talk) 20:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
Otherwise, would be happy to support this. – Lemonade51 ( talk) 15:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Mattythewhite ( talk) 01:26, 25 January 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
Good work. Mattythewhite ( talk) 23:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Comments
Think that's about it. Mattythewhite ( talk) 01:26, 25 January 2012 (UTC) reply Comments
Cheers, Mattythewhite ( talk) 16:43, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply Comments Sorry, hopefully this is it from me...!
|
Resolved comments from Struway2 ( talk) 13:00, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
*"first significant trophy" is POV: maybe something like "Liverpool won the First Division title for the first time in 1901, since when they..."
Comments. When I first looked at this list shortly after its nomination, I was going to oppose on criterion 5a, "a minimal proportion of items" being redlinked. There were at the time 109 redlinks out of under 300 names, so it was clearly terminally optimistic to reduce that proportion to anything approaching "minimal" in the couple of weeks that the nomination would be open. Having looked again and surprised to see no redlinks, I had a look at the stubs created, and was underwhelmed to find things like "Abraham Foxall is a former English footballer who played as a striker.", with an external link to LFC History, a stub tag and 2 categories: English footballers and Liverpool F.C. players. No vital dates, "is a former" rather than "was" for a man who if really still living would be celebrating his 138th birthday this year, no other clubs played for, no project banners on the talk page, and not even a Football League players category to give some assertion of notability. Clearly this isn't an actionable comment, but I wouldn't mind knowing why you chose to submit the nomination and then frantically create dozens and dozens of 12-word sub-stubs, rather than wait a few weeks till you'd done rather more of the redlinks as stubs with at least a little bit of content/context and then nominate?
Hope some of this helps, cheers, Struway2 ( talk) 10:33, 27 January 2012 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:13, 6 February 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
|
The list was promoted by Giants2008 23:08, 13 February 2012 [1].
List of Liverpool F.C. players (fewer than 25 appearances) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
My current nom has three supports and now actionable opposes or comments, so should be alright nomming this. i feel the list meets the criteria, I know there are a lot of redlinks and I will endeavour to remove these over the course of the nomination. Cheers NapHit ( talk) 17:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Lemonade51 ( talk) 20:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
Otherwise, would be happy to support this. – Lemonade51 ( talk) 15:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from Mattythewhite ( talk) 01:26, 25 January 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
Good work. Mattythewhite ( talk) 23:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Comments
Think that's about it. Mattythewhite ( talk) 01:26, 25 January 2012 (UTC) reply Comments
Cheers, Mattythewhite ( talk) 16:43, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply Comments Sorry, hopefully this is it from me...!
|
Resolved comments from Struway2 ( talk) 13:00, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
*"first significant trophy" is POV: maybe something like "Liverpool won the First Division title for the first time in 1901, since when they..."
Comments. When I first looked at this list shortly after its nomination, I was going to oppose on criterion 5a, "a minimal proportion of items" being redlinked. There were at the time 109 redlinks out of under 300 names, so it was clearly terminally optimistic to reduce that proportion to anything approaching "minimal" in the couple of weeks that the nomination would be open. Having looked again and surprised to see no redlinks, I had a look at the stubs created, and was underwhelmed to find things like "Abraham Foxall is a former English footballer who played as a striker.", with an external link to LFC History, a stub tag and 2 categories: English footballers and Liverpool F.C. players. No vital dates, "is a former" rather than "was" for a man who if really still living would be celebrating his 138th birthday this year, no other clubs played for, no project banners on the talk page, and not even a Football League players category to give some assertion of notability. Clearly this isn't an actionable comment, but I wouldn't mind knowing why you chose to submit the nomination and then frantically create dozens and dozens of 12-word sub-stubs, rather than wait a few weeks till you'd done rather more of the redlinks as stubs with at least a little bit of content/context and then nominate?
Hope some of this helps, cheers, Struway2 ( talk) 10:33, 27 January 2012 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:13, 6 February 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
|