The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 08:01, 17 January 2009 [1].
Hello, all. This is my first FL attempt. I originally split List of Oh My Goddess episodes into three separate lists because they were so long, and I am almost sure that this part was originally what caused List of Oh My Goddess episodes to become a featured list. Therefore, I am nominating this for FLC after having written a lead and peer reviewing it. There are some unaddressed points in the peer review, which I simply cannot answer, and are frankly irrelevant. I must warn, however, that I did not write a single of these episode summaries. I can rewrite some of them if need be, but I think they're fine as is. Thanks! NOCTURNENOIR talk 02:26, 4 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs) If you don't want to see the article go through a complete peer review, that's fine, but the article needs a third-party copy-edit before FL status can be attained.
Comment Please fix the dabs. Dabomb87 ( talk) 15:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Are there any further issues holding this back from FL, or is the copyedit issue still present? I really don't think there are more issues with the prose and I'm not hearing anything from either of you (Dabomb87 and Collectonian) so I don't know what to think... If there is anything I can improve please let me know. NOCTURNENOIR ( m • t • c ) 20:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC) reply
More comments I am not retracting my oppose yet. There has been definite improvement, and I feel that the article is within reach. However, the summaries need a good scrubbing by an uninvolved editor.
Oppose
Rambo's Revenge (talk) 18:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC) reply
The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 08:01, 17 January 2009 [1].
Hello, all. This is my first FL attempt. I originally split List of Oh My Goddess episodes into three separate lists because they were so long, and I am almost sure that this part was originally what caused List of Oh My Goddess episodes to become a featured list. Therefore, I am nominating this for FLC after having written a lead and peer reviewing it. There are some unaddressed points in the peer review, which I simply cannot answer, and are frankly irrelevant. I must warn, however, that I did not write a single of these episode summaries. I can rewrite some of them if need be, but I think they're fine as is. Thanks! NOCTURNENOIR talk 02:26, 4 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs) If you don't want to see the article go through a complete peer review, that's fine, but the article needs a third-party copy-edit before FL status can be attained.
Comment Please fix the dabs. Dabomb87 ( talk) 15:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Are there any further issues holding this back from FL, or is the copyedit issue still present? I really don't think there are more issues with the prose and I'm not hearing anything from either of you (Dabomb87 and Collectonian) so I don't know what to think... If there is anything I can improve please let me know. NOCTURNENOIR ( m • t • c ) 20:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC) reply
More comments I am not retracting my oppose yet. There has been definite improvement, and I feel that the article is within reach. However, the summaries need a good scrubbing by an uninvolved editor.
Oppose
Rambo's Revenge (talk) 18:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC) reply