The list was promoted by IMatthew 16:47, 7 November 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that is close to being at Featured list standard. NapHit ( talk) 20:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments The point system mentioned at the prose is the current point system. I believe that in the older years the point system were different. I haven't had time to confirm this and find a reference, but I think it should be noted that the point systems weren't always the same. Other than that, it's a great list, good job on completing the list of champions to complement the previous FLs (250cc and MotoGP). — Martin tamb ( talk) 09:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Support Great list, meets FL criteria. — Martin tamb ( talk) 21:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments –
Support Made a few tweaks, but otherwise another good list motorcycling racing list. Dabomb87 ( talk) 23:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Sources look good. Dabomb87 ( talk) 23:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments
-- Jpeeling ( talk • contribs) 17:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 09:15, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
|
Comment – Just a minor comment, are Morbidelli and MBA the same constructors? Perhaps a note should explain why are they considered the same constructor or a note that explains Morbidelli's total win of 5 includes 2 wins as MBA. —
Martin tamb (
talk)
09:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
Or probably you should split MBA and Morbidelli as two separate constructors, Morbidelli with 3 wins and MBA with 2 wins. From Morbidelli's article, it mentions that MBA (Morbidelli-Benelli-Armi) bikes was produced in a separate factory and was helped by Benelli. In my opinion, they were two different companies producing different bikes. MBA was more like a joint venture between Morbidelli and Benelli. — Martin tamb ( talk) 18:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Support, seems to be a well constructed list, also well researched, no obvious blatant errors that I can see. -- Lightlowemon ( talk) 04:13, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by IMatthew 16:47, 7 November 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that is close to being at Featured list standard. NapHit ( talk) 20:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments The point system mentioned at the prose is the current point system. I believe that in the older years the point system were different. I haven't had time to confirm this and find a reference, but I think it should be noted that the point systems weren't always the same. Other than that, it's a great list, good job on completing the list of champions to complement the previous FLs (250cc and MotoGP). — Martin tamb ( talk) 09:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Support Great list, meets FL criteria. — Martin tamb ( talk) 21:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments –
Support Made a few tweaks, but otherwise another good list motorcycling racing list. Dabomb87 ( talk) 23:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Sources look good. Dabomb87 ( talk) 23:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments
-- Jpeeling ( talk • contribs) 17:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 09:15, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
|
Comment – Just a minor comment, are Morbidelli and MBA the same constructors? Perhaps a note should explain why are they considered the same constructor or a note that explains Morbidelli's total win of 5 includes 2 wins as MBA. —
Martin tamb (
talk)
09:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
Or probably you should split MBA and Morbidelli as two separate constructors, Morbidelli with 3 wins and MBA with 2 wins. From Morbidelli's article, it mentions that MBA (Morbidelli-Benelli-Armi) bikes was produced in a separate factory and was helped by Benelli. In my opinion, they were two different companies producing different bikes. MBA was more like a joint venture between Morbidelli and Benelli. — Martin tamb ( talk) 18:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Support, seems to be a well constructed list, also well researched, no obvious blatant errors that I can see. -- Lightlowemon ( talk) 04:13, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply