I am self-nominating this article because I think it is exhaustive, good-looking, well-referenced, and contains informative explanatory paragraphs. The previous version of the article contained a list that was clustered and completely unreadable. I had been working on a completely new version of the article on my sandbox for quite a while, and copied my work onto the original article yesterday. I really checked everything, from the countries' flags to the spelling of the films' original titles. I also wrote paragraphs about the rules governing the award and the eligibility of foreign language films in other categories, since several people had inquired about this subject on the article's talk page. I tried to be as exhaustive as possible and provided the article with appropriate references and citations so that people who read it can find in it almost everything that really needs to be known about this award. BomBom 12:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose I'm not going to lie, I REALLY don't like the way those tables are formatted, but my biggest problems are:
All of your objections, including the most recent ones, have now been addressed :
Do you have (or does anybody else have) further objections to the article's Featured List Candidacy ? BomBom ( talk) 15:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC) reply
I am self-nominating this article because I think it is exhaustive, good-looking, well-referenced, and contains informative explanatory paragraphs. The previous version of the article contained a list that was clustered and completely unreadable. I had been working on a completely new version of the article on my sandbox for quite a while, and copied my work onto the original article yesterday. I really checked everything, from the countries' flags to the spelling of the films' original titles. I also wrote paragraphs about the rules governing the award and the eligibility of foreign language films in other categories, since several people had inquired about this subject on the article's talk page. I tried to be as exhaustive as possible and provided the article with appropriate references and citations so that people who read it can find in it almost everything that really needs to be known about this award. BomBom 12:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose I'm not going to lie, I REALLY don't like the way those tables are formatted, but my biggest problems are:
All of your objections, including the most recent ones, have now been addressed :
Do you have (or does anybody else have) further objections to the article's Featured List Candidacy ? BomBom ( talk) 15:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC) reply