The list was promoted by SchroCat via FACBot ( talk) 23:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC) [1]. reply
69th Academy Awards ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating the 1997 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I followed how the 1929, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015 were written. Birdienest81 ( talk) 18:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Source review (spotchecks not done):
Resolved comments from Frankie talk |
---|
Comments by FrB.TG:
In the comments is also the source review (only concerning consistency) of the article-- Frankie talk 17:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC) reply
|
Support - Looks good to me. Jimknut ( talk) 18:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Support the nomination. -- Frankie talk 19:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from
SNUGGUMS
|
---|
That's all from me. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 20:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC) reply
|
I now support based on improvements. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 15:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Source check – I have already done a source review above, spot-checking:
The list was promoted by SchroCat via FACBot ( talk) 23:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC) [1]. reply
69th Academy Awards ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating the 1997 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I followed how the 1929, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015 were written. Birdienest81 ( talk) 18:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Source review (spotchecks not done):
Resolved comments from Frankie talk |
---|
Comments by FrB.TG:
In the comments is also the source review (only concerning consistency) of the article-- Frankie talk 17:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC) reply
|
Support - Looks good to me. Jimknut ( talk) 18:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Support the nomination. -- Frankie talk 19:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from
SNUGGUMS
|
---|
That's all from me. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 20:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC) reply
|
I now support based on improvements. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 15:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Source check – I have already done a source review above, spot-checking: