The article was removed by User:Dana boomer 12:34, 12 April 2013 [1].
Issues about this article were discussed in the article talk page in November 2012. No efforts were made since then. Also, I see that some lede content should belong to the body, like the 3D release. George Ho ( talk) 15:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Before the review was relisted, there were changes. However, Production section is not easy to edit and to divide. Problems still remain, like the atrocious omittance of the film score in the main article. Even retaining a link to Jurassic Park (film score) does not help matters. -- George Ho ( talk) 00:17, 25 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The article was removed by User:Dana boomer 12:34, 12 April 2013 [1].
Issues about this article were discussed in the article talk page in November 2012. No efforts were made since then. Also, I see that some lede content should belong to the body, like the 3D release. George Ho ( talk) 15:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Before the review was relisted, there were changes. However, Production section is not easy to edit and to divide. Problems still remain, like the atrocious omittance of the film score in the main article. Even retaining a link to Jurassic Park (film score) does not help matters. -- George Ho ( talk) 00:17, 25 February 2013 (UTC) reply