The article was not promoted by User:Dana boomer 16:06, 1 March 2013 [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because... It's completely one-sided. It was promoted to FA in 2006, and offered then quite a neutral view of the place. Since then, several less-than-perfect aspects have been made to disappear, and criticisms have been archived with the issues raised left unresolved.
Examples from the first quarter of the 2006 article :
All of these statements were, as of 2006, properly sourced, as befit a FA. You'll find none of these in the current page, obviously biased, strongly in favor of an idyllic view of Detroit.
Such criticism has been made on the talk page, in August, then again in November : these comments disappeared from the talk page (left in a pristine condition...), archived without being answered.
As of today, I don't think the article is worth its FA-status anymore. Esprit Fugace ( talk) 10:41, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Notifications still not done. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by User:Dana boomer 16:06, 1 March 2013 [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because... It's completely one-sided. It was promoted to FA in 2006, and offered then quite a neutral view of the place. Since then, several less-than-perfect aspects have been made to disappear, and criticisms have been archived with the issues raised left unresolved.
Examples from the first quarter of the 2006 article :
All of these statements were, as of 2006, properly sourced, as befit a FA. You'll find none of these in the current page, obviously biased, strongly in favor of an idyllic view of Detroit.
Such criticism has been made on the talk page, in August, then again in November : these comments disappeared from the talk page (left in a pristine condition...), archived without being answered.
As of today, I don't think the article is worth its FA-status anymore. Esprit Fugace ( talk) 10:41, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Notifications still not done. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC) reply