The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 04:27, 19 October 2008 [1].
This article has just gone through a peer review, improving the quality of the citations, and conforming this article to
WP:MOS. Peer review also greatly improved the prose. --
Volcanopele (
talk)
05:12, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comments
Support - I reviewed this very interesting article back in mid-September and all my concerns were addressed. In my opinion it now meets the criteria to be a FA. - Yohhans talk 18:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Weak support—I reviewed this article when it was in Peer Review and I have no doubt that it satisfies all FA-criteria except may be 1a. I think some sentences are too complicated and some words are used too often ('lava', for instance, or 'flow'). A copy-edit may be necessary.
Ruslik (
talk)
07:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Support - I tweaked a bit, and there is still a little repetition but I found it extremely hard to remove more without losing meaning. Prose good I think now. Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 12:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 04:27, 19 October 2008 [1].
This article has just gone through a peer review, improving the quality of the citations, and conforming this article to
WP:MOS. Peer review also greatly improved the prose. --
Volcanopele (
talk)
05:12, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comments
Support - I reviewed this very interesting article back in mid-September and all my concerns were addressed. In my opinion it now meets the criteria to be a FA. - Yohhans talk 18:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Weak support—I reviewed this article when it was in Peer Review and I have no doubt that it satisfies all FA-criteria except may be 1a. I think some sentences are too complicated and some words are used too often ('lava', for instance, or 'flow'). A copy-edit may be necessary.
Ruslik (
talk)
07:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Support - I tweaked a bit, and there is still a little repetition but I found it extremely hard to remove more without losing meaning. Prose good I think now. Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 12:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC) reply