The article was promoted by GrahamColm 21:35, 30 September 2012 [1].
Rhythm Killers ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I believe it is well written, notable enough, and fulfills FA criteria. Dan56 ( talk) 15:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Quick comments on sourcing and files:
Images are fine, but the music samples are a little questionable. A detailed explanation of what the samples are adding to the article is required in the rationale. Further, each song has literally a short sentence devoted to it; are these really needed? Even if you are going to try to justify them as illustrations of the musical style of the whole album, do we really need two? J Milburn ( talk) 16:24, 20 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Are spotchecks, of sources for verification and close-paraphrasing, next? Dan56 ( talk) 20:39, 28 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Delegate's comments - Yes. I would like to see a few spotchecks. Graham Colm ( talk) 10:00, 30 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Delegate's spotchecks
(notice the ugly fused participle that we would not allow here)
No issues found. Graham Colm ( talk) 21:21, 30 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by GrahamColm 21:35, 30 September 2012 [1].
Rhythm Killers ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I believe it is well written, notable enough, and fulfills FA criteria. Dan56 ( talk) 15:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Quick comments on sourcing and files:
Images are fine, but the music samples are a little questionable. A detailed explanation of what the samples are adding to the article is required in the rationale. Further, each song has literally a short sentence devoted to it; are these really needed? Even if you are going to try to justify them as illustrations of the musical style of the whole album, do we really need two? J Milburn ( talk) 16:24, 20 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Are spotchecks, of sources for verification and close-paraphrasing, next? Dan56 ( talk) 20:39, 28 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Delegate's comments - Yes. I would like to see a few spotchecks. Graham Colm ( talk) 10:00, 30 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Delegate's spotchecks
(notice the ugly fused participle that we would not allow here)
No issues found. Graham Colm ( talk) 21:21, 30 September 2012 (UTC) reply