The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 22:27, 21 February 2009 [1].
I'm nominating this article for featured article because...this is the article's second nomination. I have worked on nearly all of the criticisms levelled upon it during its last FAC review, and believe the article has improved enough for a second entry to FAC. Parrot of Doom ( talk) 12:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments -
Oppose on criterion 3
These issues should be relatively easy to resolve. Awadewit ( talk) 19:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Support - the issues that were raised in the previous FAC have been addressed. Graham Colm Talk 18:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Support. A very well-done city article.
Karanacs (
talk) 19:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments. My comprehensiveness concerns have been addressed. When the italics issue is fixed I'll support.
Karanacs (
talk) 17:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Weak Oppose for now. I worry a little about comprehensiveness in the history section, and there are MOS issues that need to be fixed.
reply
Karanacs ( talk) 15:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 22:27, 21 February 2009 [1].
I'm nominating this article for featured article because...this is the article's second nomination. I have worked on nearly all of the criticisms levelled upon it during its last FAC review, and believe the article has improved enough for a second entry to FAC. Parrot of Doom ( talk) 12:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments -
Oppose on criterion 3
These issues should be relatively easy to resolve. Awadewit ( talk) 19:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Support - the issues that were raised in the previous FAC have been addressed. Graham Colm Talk 18:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Support. A very well-done city article.
Karanacs (
talk) 19:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments. My comprehensiveness concerns have been addressed. When the italics issue is fixed I'll support.
Karanacs (
talk) 17:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Weak Oppose for now. I worry a little about comprehensiveness in the history section, and there are MOS issues that need to be fixed.
reply
Karanacs ( talk) 15:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC) reply