The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 22:43, 30 August 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because it is a fairly complete treatment of the subject, passed GA some time ago and is stable. Simon Burchell ( talk) 09:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|link=|
" may be appropriate; see
WP:ALT #When to specify.
Eubulides (
talk)
20:40, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
To sum up, an interesting read and very nearly there. A couple of explanations or tweaks and you're home.
Casliber (
talk ·
contribs)
11:42, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Maybe the population and economy section would be best after history? Dr. Blofeld White cat 17:58, 11 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The population density of the site has been estimated at 400 to 500 per square kilometer (1040 to 1300 per square mile) in the centre of the city during the Late Classic[15] with an estimated total population of 1200–1600;[16] surveys have revealed an average of 130 structures per square kilometer (338 per square mile) at the site, compared with 1449 structures/km² (3767 per square mile) in central Copán.[17] The low population density indicates that Quirigua served as the focus for a dispersed rural population.[9]
I only got about half way through the article, but I think it's likely that the rest of the article has serious issues. In conclusion, the article needs a copy edit to smooth out the prose, but I'm more concerned about the article needing more information. Nev1 ( talk) 20:20, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
I'm much happier about the article and its comprehensiveness now and feel that it's much more accessible to the layman. Thanks for your patience. Nev1 ( talk) 22:12, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 22:43, 30 August 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because it is a fairly complete treatment of the subject, passed GA some time ago and is stable. Simon Burchell ( talk) 09:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|link=|
" may be appropriate; see
WP:ALT #When to specify.
Eubulides (
talk)
20:40, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
To sum up, an interesting read and very nearly there. A couple of explanations or tweaks and you're home.
Casliber (
talk ·
contribs)
11:42, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Maybe the population and economy section would be best after history? Dr. Blofeld White cat 17:58, 11 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The population density of the site has been estimated at 400 to 500 per square kilometer (1040 to 1300 per square mile) in the centre of the city during the Late Classic[15] with an estimated total population of 1200–1600;[16] surveys have revealed an average of 130 structures per square kilometer (338 per square mile) at the site, compared with 1449 structures/km² (3767 per square mile) in central Copán.[17] The low population density indicates that Quirigua served as the focus for a dispersed rural population.[9]
I only got about half way through the article, but I think it's likely that the rest of the article has serious issues. In conclusion, the article needs a copy edit to smooth out the prose, but I'm more concerned about the article needing more information. Nev1 ( talk) 20:20, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
I'm much happier about the article and its comprehensiveness now and feel that it's much more accessible to the layman. Thanks for your patience. Nev1 ( talk) 22:12, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply