Self-nomination. Was on peer review
here, and concerns about the length of the plot synopsis have been addressed. While the film itself may not have been released so long ago, I believe that the article is as strong as other featured articles about big (as well as small) screen productions.
Extraordinary Machine04:22, 27 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Comment: You might add some sort of short intro to the Cast section, mentioning any casting problems, or break-out roles, or anything else worth mentioning to keep the section from just being a list. —
BRIAN0918 • 2005-10-27 05:26
I couldn't find any information titbits about the casting of the film (other than Courteney Cox, and that's already mentioned in the "Development" section), or anything that suggested that cast members other than Cox had their careers changed somehow by their participation in the film. I could include quotes from critics about their performances, but that may look odd when there are reviews quoted further down the article, and also not all the performances were commented on by anybody (particularly Nick Offerman and Matthew Carey). I've removed the "Cast" section entirely and fleshed out the lead section of the article a little, to include a mention of Matthew Carey (this is similar to the layout of
Sunset Boulevard (1950 film) in terms of mentions of the cast).
Extraordinary Machine13:51, 27 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support I love the attention you showed the plot, very well written had me in suspense waiting for the ending and then it just stopped, now that is what I call A grade material. Also I appecriate your use of the screen shots from right to left helps the article flow smoothly because it is a rather long read.
KnowledgeOfSelf17:19, 27 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Thanks. The problem is, I read this article so many times while editing it that my mind kind of went blank in regards to its smaller problems. Don't worry, though, I'll take another look at it sometime today (hopefully!).
Extraordinary Machine13:16, 31 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Self-nomination. Was on peer review
here, and concerns about the length of the plot synopsis have been addressed. While the film itself may not have been released so long ago, I believe that the article is as strong as other featured articles about big (as well as small) screen productions.
Extraordinary Machine04:22, 27 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Comment: You might add some sort of short intro to the Cast section, mentioning any casting problems, or break-out roles, or anything else worth mentioning to keep the section from just being a list. —
BRIAN0918 • 2005-10-27 05:26
I couldn't find any information titbits about the casting of the film (other than Courteney Cox, and that's already mentioned in the "Development" section), or anything that suggested that cast members other than Cox had their careers changed somehow by their participation in the film. I could include quotes from critics about their performances, but that may look odd when there are reviews quoted further down the article, and also not all the performances were commented on by anybody (particularly Nick Offerman and Matthew Carey). I've removed the "Cast" section entirely and fleshed out the lead section of the article a little, to include a mention of Matthew Carey (this is similar to the layout of
Sunset Boulevard (1950 film) in terms of mentions of the cast).
Extraordinary Machine13:51, 27 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support I love the attention you showed the plot, very well written had me in suspense waiting for the ending and then it just stopped, now that is what I call A grade material. Also I appecriate your use of the screen shots from right to left helps the article flow smoothly because it is a rather long read.
KnowledgeOfSelf17:19, 27 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Thanks. The problem is, I read this article so many times while editing it that my mind kind of went blank in regards to its smaller problems. Don't worry, though, I'll take another look at it sometime today (hopefully!).
Extraordinary Machine13:16, 31 October 2005 (UTC)reply