The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 03:32, 27 January 2009 [1].
I'm nominating this article for featured article because it's been a good article for a while, and now that the appeal has failed, I don't think the story will develop much in the short term. I am willing to make fixes based on suggestions here, and feel that the article isn't too far from featured status is ready to go through FAC.
J Milburn (
talk)
19:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
reply
Comment: I've not read the article, but if by your own admission it is not yet up to FA standard, ("isn't too far from featured status"), then it has been brought here too soon. Peer review, not FAC, is the place for suggestions and fixes. It is a stated requirement for nomination (see above) that you ensure that when you bring an article here, it meets all the FA criteria. You should consider withdrawing and taking the article to PR. Brianboulton ( talk) 00:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Image review - All three images are fair use and, in my opinion, they satisfy WP:NFCC. Awadewit ( talk) 16:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments -
Comment
Fainites barley scribs 23:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Fainites barley scribs 14:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 03:32, 27 January 2009 [1].
I'm nominating this article for featured article because it's been a good article for a while, and now that the appeal has failed, I don't think the story will develop much in the short term. I am willing to make fixes based on suggestions here, and feel that the article isn't too far from featured status is ready to go through FAC.
J Milburn (
talk)
19:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
reply
Comment: I've not read the article, but if by your own admission it is not yet up to FA standard, ("isn't too far from featured status"), then it has been brought here too soon. Peer review, not FAC, is the place for suggestions and fixes. It is a stated requirement for nomination (see above) that you ensure that when you bring an article here, it meets all the FA criteria. You should consider withdrawing and taking the article to PR. Brianboulton ( talk) 00:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Image review - All three images are fair use and, in my opinion, they satisfy WP:NFCC. Awadewit ( talk) 16:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments -
Comment
Fainites barley scribs 23:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Fainites barley scribs 14:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC) reply