The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 03:11, 16 January 2010 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
Here we have an article about Richard the Lionheart's favourite castle. There's not an enormous amount to say about it because the site was built in one phase, a monumental effort that was mostly complete in just two years, and the most important parts of its history were the first few years of its existence. The article details the main points about the castle, touching on its history and its importance in the context of castle building, and I believe it is comprehensive. Thanks in advance to anyone who takes the time to review the article. Nev1 ( talk) 16:46, 21 December 2009 (UTC) reply
|map_alt=
parameter of {{
Infobox Military Structure}}.Image review: all images are verifiably in the public domain or appropriately licensed. However, File:Plan.Chateau.Gaillard.png and File:Siege.Chateau.Gaillard.png would do better to have more accurate PD templates and at least descriptions of their authors and page numbers in the Dictionary. The FAC, however, does not need to be hold up by this. Jappalang ( talk) 08:53, 23 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments Support:
Overall, a fine piece on a castle of the Lion. I am leaning to support on resolution of the above. Jappalang ( talk) 08:53, 23 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose, not nearly comprehensive [failing 1 b)], and don't see how it can be resolved in this session. E.g. "In the 1990s, archaeological excavations were carried out at Château-Gaillard; in conjunction with the archaeological work, efforts were made to preserve the structure." Fascinating ... would expect a paragraph if this were a realistic FA candidate, but in fact that's my lot. # Innovations and layout is just awash with such assertions, that just hint at info but then move on. Fair enough for a B, not for an FA. Appears that most of the material on this castle is in the French language, but there's nothing in the main references section in that language; maybe that's the problem? Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk) 16:27, 24 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 03:11, 16 January 2010 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
Here we have an article about Richard the Lionheart's favourite castle. There's not an enormous amount to say about it because the site was built in one phase, a monumental effort that was mostly complete in just two years, and the most important parts of its history were the first few years of its existence. The article details the main points about the castle, touching on its history and its importance in the context of castle building, and I believe it is comprehensive. Thanks in advance to anyone who takes the time to review the article. Nev1 ( talk) 16:46, 21 December 2009 (UTC) reply
|map_alt=
parameter of {{
Infobox Military Structure}}.Image review: all images are verifiably in the public domain or appropriately licensed. However, File:Plan.Chateau.Gaillard.png and File:Siege.Chateau.Gaillard.png would do better to have more accurate PD templates and at least descriptions of their authors and page numbers in the Dictionary. The FAC, however, does not need to be hold up by this. Jappalang ( talk) 08:53, 23 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments Support:
Overall, a fine piece on a castle of the Lion. I am leaning to support on resolution of the above. Jappalang ( talk) 08:53, 23 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose, not nearly comprehensive [failing 1 b)], and don't see how it can be resolved in this session. E.g. "In the 1990s, archaeological excavations were carried out at Château-Gaillard; in conjunction with the archaeological work, efforts were made to preserve the structure." Fascinating ... would expect a paragraph if this were a realistic FA candidate, but in fact that's my lot. # Innovations and layout is just awash with such assertions, that just hint at info but then move on. Fair enough for a B, not for an FA. Appears that most of the material on this castle is in the French language, but there's nothing in the main references section in that language; maybe that's the problem? Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk) 16:27, 24 December 2009 (UTC) reply