Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard | ||
---|---|---|
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.
You must notify any user you have reported. You may use You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a
bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious
point of view edits and other good-faith changes
do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See
here for exemptions.
Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
| ||
Page: Dyson (company) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 2A02:C7C:7D8D:1400:C4AB:83C4:83C0:98D7 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Other edits 2 days ago
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Note that I've also included edits above from 2 days ago on a different IP on the /64 range. —
Czello (
music)
14:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Page: Liv Morgan ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 102.67.77.85 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Comments:
Persistent addition of an unreliable source which has been flagged to the user. — Czello ( music) 20:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Page:
Senate of Thailand (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
User being reported:
Preime TH (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log)
Previous version reverted to: [4]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [8]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [10]
Comments:
The disagreement was whether the senate composition diagram should reflect de jure or de facto nature of the chamber. There seem to be precedents supporting both cases such as
Senate of Canada (which shows parliamentary groups) and
National Council (Bhutan) (which shows source of members). I proposed a compromise to show both diagrams at the same time, without objections from the user. However, since I put on the second diagram, I was accused of being "crazy about politics"
[11] and "bossy,"
[12] which might indicate the user's lack of interest in participating in good-faith discussion.
Horus ( talk) 07:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Page: Cheb Mami ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Revirvlkodlaku ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Apart from violating 3RR, they seem to be more interested in making a point than improving the article: first, they restored some unsourced nonsense while expecting me to provide an explanation of why "unsourced nonsense" is "unsourced" and "nonsense", second, they removed content that I added while falsely labelling their editing as "copyediting" and when restored, they removed it again without explanation, and again while asking to start a discussion that I already started hours earlier. M.Bitton ( talk) 09:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Page: Elliot Rodger ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Adult Virgin ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Editor is reverting to their preferred version. Notably the last two reverts have been while there is an RFC in process. TarnishedPath talk 12:29, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Please block. Warning would be inadequate for this disagreeable user who is calling others "stupid" and fighting over their preferred version. I anticipate this user will see an indef sooner than later.
—DIYeditor (
talk)
12:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Please also compare to
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dominic_Pringle/Archive. I hear some ducks.
TarnishedPath
talk
12:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Page:
Richmond, North Yorkshire (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
User being reported:
HazzelDazzleDoDah (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log)
Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
[18]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: User Talk:HazzelDazzleDoDah
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [19]
Comments:
I'm not interested in being right, only getting it right. I don't care for an edit war or whatever you think is going on here.I am more than happy with Kovcszaln6's suggestion about consensus regarding the content - my issue was its removal when it has been properly cited without a sensible reason for its removal. Thanks. The joy of all things ( talk) 18:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Page:
Mughal Empire (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
User being reported:
Curious man123 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log)
Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [22]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [23]
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [24]
Comments:
Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard | ||
---|---|---|
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.
You must notify any user you have reported. You may use You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a
bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious
point of view edits and other good-faith changes
do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See
here for exemptions.
Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
| ||
Page: Dyson (company) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 2A02:C7C:7D8D:1400:C4AB:83C4:83C0:98D7 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Other edits 2 days ago
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Note that I've also included edits above from 2 days ago on a different IP on the /64 range. —
Czello (
music)
14:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Page: Liv Morgan ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 102.67.77.85 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Comments:
Persistent addition of an unreliable source which has been flagged to the user. — Czello ( music) 20:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Page:
Senate of Thailand (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
User being reported:
Preime TH (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log)
Previous version reverted to: [4]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [8]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [10]
Comments:
The disagreement was whether the senate composition diagram should reflect de jure or de facto nature of the chamber. There seem to be precedents supporting both cases such as
Senate of Canada (which shows parliamentary groups) and
National Council (Bhutan) (which shows source of members). I proposed a compromise to show both diagrams at the same time, without objections from the user. However, since I put on the second diagram, I was accused of being "crazy about politics"
[11] and "bossy,"
[12] which might indicate the user's lack of interest in participating in good-faith discussion.
Horus ( talk) 07:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Page: Cheb Mami ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Revirvlkodlaku ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Apart from violating 3RR, they seem to be more interested in making a point than improving the article: first, they restored some unsourced nonsense while expecting me to provide an explanation of why "unsourced nonsense" is "unsourced" and "nonsense", second, they removed content that I added while falsely labelling their editing as "copyediting" and when restored, they removed it again without explanation, and again while asking to start a discussion that I already started hours earlier. M.Bitton ( talk) 09:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Page: Elliot Rodger ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Adult Virgin ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Editor is reverting to their preferred version. Notably the last two reverts have been while there is an RFC in process. TarnishedPath talk 12:29, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Please block. Warning would be inadequate for this disagreeable user who is calling others "stupid" and fighting over their preferred version. I anticipate this user will see an indef sooner than later.
—DIYeditor (
talk)
12:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Please also compare to
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dominic_Pringle/Archive. I hear some ducks.
TarnishedPath
talk
12:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Page:
Richmond, North Yorkshire (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
User being reported:
HazzelDazzleDoDah (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log)
Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
[18]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: User Talk:HazzelDazzleDoDah
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [19]
Comments:
I'm not interested in being right, only getting it right. I don't care for an edit war or whatever you think is going on here.I am more than happy with Kovcszaln6's suggestion about consensus regarding the content - my issue was its removal when it has been properly cited without a sensible reason for its removal. Thanks. The joy of all things ( talk) 18:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Page:
Mughal Empire (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
User being reported:
Curious man123 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log)
Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [22]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [23]
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [24]
Comments: