The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Company meets notability criteria 68.178.100.214 ( talk) 21:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astro Empires was proposed and accepted for deletion because the game did not meet Wikipedia Notability requirements. This is no longer the case as the game as been featured in more than one press article in its home country of Portugal. The observatoriodo algarve Website, the largest regional News site in Algarve, Portugal the home of the game have published an in-depth look at the game link along with Correio da Manhã. The later, in December 2007 featured an interview with game creator Nuno Rosário. The game has expanded with four simultaneous servers with over 33,000 players. After discussions on the achieve talk page for the old article of the game ( here) it was recommended that the case if put forward here. Butch-cassidy ( talk) 21:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.138.10.89 ( talk • contribs) — 85.138.10.89 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— Astro Empires ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John major jenkins was proposed for deletion, under Afd procedures, as a non-notable biography. Investigating the individual, I found a number of reliable –verifiable and credible sources that allowed for a contention that this individual did met the standards for inclusion at Wikipedia as noted here [1]. It so happens that RogueNinja actually places a CSD G11 tag on the article itself, resulting in a Speedy deletion. However, the supposed copyright violation was from the page of the individual the article was written about. Was there a copyright violation, I am not sure, in that I can not compare the versions of the articles at this point. But typically, notice is given, by the individual placing the tag, to both the author and any other interested parties that there is suspected copy right violation and either correct or the article will be deleted. This did not happen. My requests is either have the article re-listed at Afd or, provide the original text to me. In which case, I will rewrite the article with the proper references and cites to establish clear notability. Thanks. Shoessss | Chat 20:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
This person (also known as Corey Delaney) is all over the news and internet after holding a large party and making a number of appearances in the media which garnered a lot of reaction. The article was deleted awhile ago and I undeleted it starting from scratch, thinking he is a notable person. Another admin deleted it again 6 hours later, and I believe the re-deletion was not justified and ignored the information I put in the article about what has happened recently. I had created the new page from scratch with something like 21 news articles from the BBC [2], International Herald Tribune [3], and major Australian newspapers, and American shows like Best Week Ever. The Times of London [4], AP [5],etc also talked about him. I also added on a section about the aftermath and his activities after the party, which was one of the major concerns from before - his future prospects have been the subject of much media coverage - he has been "earmarked" to host the Australian Big Brother [6], he's going on an international DJ tour, [7] he's modeling in Australia [8], Ozzy Osborne was interviewed about him [9], hosting parties [10], and even smaller stuff makes the news - a contest to win his sunglasses [11], which also led to sales in those sunglasses exploding [12], he was beaten up outside a mall, which got a lot of press coverage (for example [13] [14]) and when it came out that the fight might have been staged, it got more press coverage (i.e. [15]). There are tons of Facebook groups, t-shirts, etc for the guy, he's been called an "international hero" [16], "one of the world's most famous teenagers," [17] and so on. I would argue that he's notable not because of the party, but because of his appearances on the media, the reaction to those appearances, (such as [18] [19] and even a t-shirt [20]) and what he's doing now, (TV gigs, tour etc) which to me would invalidate the argument that he is famous in connection with only one event. Even what his name is has been in the news. [21] So in short, I think he's notable, not just for one incident, and deserves a page here. It adds to the encyclopedia. AW ( talk) 19:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
If you look through the votes, many of the votes have poor reasons to keep, and nearly all the keep votes were shown to be ignoring wikipedia policy and precedent. RogueNinja talk 18:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Page was deleted via PROD, with the reason stated "This is pure advertisement and PR" on the deletion log. I would like to improve the article and attempt to fix any of the advert and "PR" problems with said article. I'm requesting that the content of the page just prior to its deletion be restored in my userspace, as well (if possible) any pertinent discussion which existed further explaining its reason for deletion so that I may use that to improve the article. → ClarkCT Talk @ 17:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Now confirmed on myspace.com/thenewregime as a solo project from Ilan Rubin of Lostprophets, therefore associating it with an undeniably notable band U-Mos ( talk) 15:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Notable enough, the focus of national press and ongoing investigation of the murderer, who is likely a serial killer. Should be speedily undeleted and moved to Murder of Meredith Emerson. Does not fulfill WP:BLP1E because well referenced. See also User:JoshuaZ/Thoughts on BLP 3sides ( talk) 09:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
No consensus. On argument against this article was the use of primary sources. But these were published sources, not eye-witness accounts etc., and Wikipedia's guideline is that Primary sources that have been published by a reliable source (which these have) may be used in Wikipedia. (Moreover, many modern newspaper reports might be considered primary sources and newspapers' reliability is not always good. ie: "Titanic sinks - passengers saved!") Please see the Keep comments on the AfD discussion page. Regards, David Lauder ( talk) 09:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
UNDELETE_Notability Bydesignonly ( talk) 04:36, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Claim to notability: A quick search on Google ( http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=sheraton+cadwell&btnG=Search) displays about 10 pages of references to "Sheraton Cadwell", including the many CD albums the musical organisation has released with its various orchestras. In addition, the article has been re-edited, with external links removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bydesignonly ( talk • contribs) 14:50, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Company meets notability criteria 68.178.100.214 ( talk) 21:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astro Empires was proposed and accepted for deletion because the game did not meet Wikipedia Notability requirements. This is no longer the case as the game as been featured in more than one press article in its home country of Portugal. The observatoriodo algarve Website, the largest regional News site in Algarve, Portugal the home of the game have published an in-depth look at the game link along with Correio da Manhã. The later, in December 2007 featured an interview with game creator Nuno Rosário. The game has expanded with four simultaneous servers with over 33,000 players. After discussions on the achieve talk page for the old article of the game ( here) it was recommended that the case if put forward here. Butch-cassidy ( talk) 21:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.138.10.89 ( talk • contribs) — 85.138.10.89 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— Astro Empires ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John major jenkins was proposed for deletion, under Afd procedures, as a non-notable biography. Investigating the individual, I found a number of reliable –verifiable and credible sources that allowed for a contention that this individual did met the standards for inclusion at Wikipedia as noted here [1]. It so happens that RogueNinja actually places a CSD G11 tag on the article itself, resulting in a Speedy deletion. However, the supposed copyright violation was from the page of the individual the article was written about. Was there a copyright violation, I am not sure, in that I can not compare the versions of the articles at this point. But typically, notice is given, by the individual placing the tag, to both the author and any other interested parties that there is suspected copy right violation and either correct or the article will be deleted. This did not happen. My requests is either have the article re-listed at Afd or, provide the original text to me. In which case, I will rewrite the article with the proper references and cites to establish clear notability. Thanks. Shoessss | Chat 20:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
This person (also known as Corey Delaney) is all over the news and internet after holding a large party and making a number of appearances in the media which garnered a lot of reaction. The article was deleted awhile ago and I undeleted it starting from scratch, thinking he is a notable person. Another admin deleted it again 6 hours later, and I believe the re-deletion was not justified and ignored the information I put in the article about what has happened recently. I had created the new page from scratch with something like 21 news articles from the BBC [2], International Herald Tribune [3], and major Australian newspapers, and American shows like Best Week Ever. The Times of London [4], AP [5],etc also talked about him. I also added on a section about the aftermath and his activities after the party, which was one of the major concerns from before - his future prospects have been the subject of much media coverage - he has been "earmarked" to host the Australian Big Brother [6], he's going on an international DJ tour, [7] he's modeling in Australia [8], Ozzy Osborne was interviewed about him [9], hosting parties [10], and even smaller stuff makes the news - a contest to win his sunglasses [11], which also led to sales in those sunglasses exploding [12], he was beaten up outside a mall, which got a lot of press coverage (for example [13] [14]) and when it came out that the fight might have been staged, it got more press coverage (i.e. [15]). There are tons of Facebook groups, t-shirts, etc for the guy, he's been called an "international hero" [16], "one of the world's most famous teenagers," [17] and so on. I would argue that he's notable not because of the party, but because of his appearances on the media, the reaction to those appearances, (such as [18] [19] and even a t-shirt [20]) and what he's doing now, (TV gigs, tour etc) which to me would invalidate the argument that he is famous in connection with only one event. Even what his name is has been in the news. [21] So in short, I think he's notable, not just for one incident, and deserves a page here. It adds to the encyclopedia. AW ( talk) 19:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
If you look through the votes, many of the votes have poor reasons to keep, and nearly all the keep votes were shown to be ignoring wikipedia policy and precedent. RogueNinja talk 18:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Page was deleted via PROD, with the reason stated "This is pure advertisement and PR" on the deletion log. I would like to improve the article and attempt to fix any of the advert and "PR" problems with said article. I'm requesting that the content of the page just prior to its deletion be restored in my userspace, as well (if possible) any pertinent discussion which existed further explaining its reason for deletion so that I may use that to improve the article. → ClarkCT Talk @ 17:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Now confirmed on myspace.com/thenewregime as a solo project from Ilan Rubin of Lostprophets, therefore associating it with an undeniably notable band U-Mos ( talk) 15:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Notable enough, the focus of national press and ongoing investigation of the murderer, who is likely a serial killer. Should be speedily undeleted and moved to Murder of Meredith Emerson. Does not fulfill WP:BLP1E because well referenced. See also User:JoshuaZ/Thoughts on BLP 3sides ( talk) 09:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
No consensus. On argument against this article was the use of primary sources. But these were published sources, not eye-witness accounts etc., and Wikipedia's guideline is that Primary sources that have been published by a reliable source (which these have) may be used in Wikipedia. (Moreover, many modern newspaper reports might be considered primary sources and newspapers' reliability is not always good. ie: "Titanic sinks - passengers saved!") Please see the Keep comments on the AfD discussion page. Regards, David Lauder ( talk) 09:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
UNDELETE_Notability Bydesignonly ( talk) 04:36, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Claim to notability: A quick search on Google ( http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=sheraton+cadwell&btnG=Search) displays about 10 pages of references to "Sheraton Cadwell", including the many CD albums the musical organisation has released with its various orchestras. In addition, the article has been re-edited, with external links removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bydesignonly ( talk • contribs) 14:50, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |