Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I've cleaned out the overuse of quotation. The larger issue is unattributed translation from Spanish Wikipedia. I fixed it in this article and notified the contributor of the need to handle this differently. I glanced and her two other translation issues were addressed by her or by others.
Moonriddengirl(talk)14:49, 28 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Located as unique text first published according to google claim in 2004. Also its uncited spam: it wasn't written for wikipedia by close text analysis. No I can't be bothered logging in, I'm reading a romantic fiction novel which mentioned axminster carpets.
120.18.16.219 (
talk)
11:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)reply
No copyright concern. This is the
First edit. Edits to that text
here show that the external site identified as a potential source follow our evolutions, which means we came before them. I understand the concern, but an edit-by-edit review of the article over the next several years shows that the contributor in question was a frequent editor of the entire article, modifying her own text frequently. The language is not significantly different from the tone she took in other articles she created or massively expanded. Hence, I have no verification of copyright issue..
Moonriddengirl(talk)15:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I've cleaned out the overuse of quotation. The larger issue is unattributed translation from Spanish Wikipedia. I fixed it in this article and notified the contributor of the need to handle this differently. I glanced and her two other translation issues were addressed by her or by others.
Moonriddengirl(talk)14:49, 28 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Located as unique text first published according to google claim in 2004. Also its uncited spam: it wasn't written for wikipedia by close text analysis. No I can't be bothered logging in, I'm reading a romantic fiction novel which mentioned axminster carpets.
120.18.16.219 (
talk)
11:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)reply
No copyright concern. This is the
First edit. Edits to that text
here show that the external site identified as a potential source follow our evolutions, which means we came before them. I understand the concern, but an edit-by-edit review of the article over the next several years shows that the contributor in question was a frequent editor of the entire article, modifying her own text frequently. The language is not significantly different from the tone she took in other articles she created or massively expanded. Hence, I have no verification of copyright issue..
Moonriddengirl(talk)15:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)reply