From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

18 March 2013

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2013-03-18 Edit

2013-03-18 (Suspected copyright violations)
Tagged page has been deleted. Hut 8.5 11:06, 23 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Attribution added. Hut 8.5 11:06, 23 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Attribution added, content is from South Morava, URL is a mirror. Hut 8.5 11:06, 23 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Mentor Public Library ( history · last edit) Copied and pasted from http://www.mentorpl.org/pdfs/MPL1990.pdf. VWBot ( talk) 00:21, 19 March 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Wars of the Roses ( history · last edit) Close paraphrase of Alison Weir's "Lancaster and York". VWBot ( talk) 00:15, 18 March 2013 (UTC) reply
    • It would appear that to check this one you would need copies of the books involved so moved here as that may take some time. Dpmuk ( talk) 15:23, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
      • Content seems to have been added by User:Jim Hardie. (See [2]). User:Kansas Bear apparently has access to this source (or did); Kansas Bear, are you able to determine if this is still an issue and if the content taken is likely to rise to the level of copyright problem? If content is substantial and is still there, we probably need to review it, but, alas, I can't see the source. :/ -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:57, 15 April 2014 (UTC) reply
        • Taking a quick look, the paragraph, "At the same time, the middle class was growing more prosperous and influential through its mercantile interests. The slow decline of the wool trade after 1450 was offset by increased demand from abroad, not only for woollen cloth, but for tin, lead, leather and other products. Calais, which remained in English hands after the rest of England's French territories were lost in 1453, was the chief wool market, attracting merchants from all over Europe. The importance of retaining Calais was therefore crucial for the nation's continued prosperity. During the Wars of the Roses, however, Calais also came to be seen as a potential place of refuge for those who had fallen from power, and even as a springboard for the potential invasion of England.", still possesses bits of plagiarism of the Weir source. Sorry for the delay, I have been rather busy at work this week and have not had a chance to check Weir's book. [3] The best course would be remove all the Weir sentences and rewrite that section of the article using sources written by historians. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 06:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I've now gone ahead and presumptively removed (I think!) the material added by the editor identified by Moonriddengirl, and asked for comments on the talk page of the article. Unless I've overlooked something, I think this can perhaps be marked as resolved. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 10:11, 23 April 2014 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

18 March 2013

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2013-03-18 Edit

2013-03-18 (Suspected copyright violations)
Tagged page has been deleted. Hut 8.5 11:06, 23 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Attribution added. Hut 8.5 11:06, 23 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Attribution added, content is from South Morava, URL is a mirror. Hut 8.5 11:06, 23 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Mentor Public Library ( history · last edit) Copied and pasted from http://www.mentorpl.org/pdfs/MPL1990.pdf. VWBot ( talk) 00:21, 19 March 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Wars of the Roses ( history · last edit) Close paraphrase of Alison Weir's "Lancaster and York". VWBot ( talk) 00:15, 18 March 2013 (UTC) reply
    • It would appear that to check this one you would need copies of the books involved so moved here as that may take some time. Dpmuk ( talk) 15:23, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
      • Content seems to have been added by User:Jim Hardie. (See [2]). User:Kansas Bear apparently has access to this source (or did); Kansas Bear, are you able to determine if this is still an issue and if the content taken is likely to rise to the level of copyright problem? If content is substantial and is still there, we probably need to review it, but, alas, I can't see the source. :/ -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:57, 15 April 2014 (UTC) reply
        • Taking a quick look, the paragraph, "At the same time, the middle class was growing more prosperous and influential through its mercantile interests. The slow decline of the wool trade after 1450 was offset by increased demand from abroad, not only for woollen cloth, but for tin, lead, leather and other products. Calais, which remained in English hands after the rest of England's French territories were lost in 1453, was the chief wool market, attracting merchants from all over Europe. The importance of retaining Calais was therefore crucial for the nation's continued prosperity. During the Wars of the Roses, however, Calais also came to be seen as a potential place of refuge for those who had fallen from power, and even as a springboard for the potential invasion of England.", still possesses bits of plagiarism of the Weir source. Sorry for the delay, I have been rather busy at work this week and have not had a chance to check Weir's book. [3] The best course would be remove all the Weir sentences and rewrite that section of the article using sources written by historians. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 06:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I've now gone ahead and presumptively removed (I think!) the material added by the editor identified by Moonriddengirl, and asked for comments on the talk page of the article. Unless I've overlooked something, I think this can perhaps be marked as resolved. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 10:11, 23 April 2014 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook