Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

10 February 2011

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-02-10 Edit

2011-02-10 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Acather96 ( talk) 07:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 07:17, 19 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 07:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article redirected to non-infringing article. Acather96 ( talk) 07:20, 19 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 07:23, 19 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Somewhat extensive quote, but I think it is not overly substantial given the size of the source and the article. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • ? The source is popping up dead for me, but a google search doesn't find text matches. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • I'll go ahead and call this a false positive - I've found some similar short bios but it doesn't seem to be copied from any of them. VernoWhitney ( talk) 15:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article blanked for evaluation and closure through WP:CP. I only blanked what I could confirm as copyvio - the remainder looks copied from somewhere (e.g., "Working together we can secure the best use of scarce expertise and resources") but I couldn't find it. VernoWhitney ( talk) 15:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Permission plausible Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Single author. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:45, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Similar language remains in parts, but I think it's clean enough. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:44, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:39, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. History restored for attribution. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Reverse copyvio. Details on my talk and the article's talk. VernoWhitney ( talk) 02:52, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Well, I've verified duplication of some content, but for every text match I've been able to find, we are the point of first publication. This is a strange one, but it seems that the content was placed here by the author first, either directly or through a PhD student agent. Without some evidence of prior publication, I believe we should presume that the content is here legitimately. If evidence of prior publication is produced, we'll need to seek an official donation. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:53, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2011_February_10&oldid=415318648"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

10 February 2011

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-02-10 Edit

2011-02-10 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Acather96 ( talk) 07:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 07:17, 19 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 07:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article redirected to non-infringing article. Acather96 ( talk) 07:20, 19 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 07:23, 19 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Somewhat extensive quote, but I think it is not overly substantial given the size of the source and the article. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • ? The source is popping up dead for me, but a google search doesn't find text matches. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • I'll go ahead and call this a false positive - I've found some similar short bios but it doesn't seem to be copied from any of them. VernoWhitney ( talk) 15:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article blanked for evaluation and closure through WP:CP. I only blanked what I could confirm as copyvio - the remainder looks copied from somewhere (e.g., "Working together we can secure the best use of scarce expertise and resources") but I couldn't find it. VernoWhitney ( talk) 15:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Permission plausible Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Single author. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:45, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Similar language remains in parts, but I think it's clean enough. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:44, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:39, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. History restored for attribution. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Reverse copyvio. Details on my talk and the article's talk. VernoWhitney ( talk) 02:52, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Well, I've verified duplication of some content, but for every text match I've been able to find, we are the point of first publication. This is a strange one, but it seems that the content was placed here by the author first, either directly or through a PhD student agent. Without some evidence of prior publication, I believe we should presume that the content is here legitimately. If evidence of prior publication is produced, we'll need to seek an official donation. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:53, 22 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2011_February_10&oldid=415318648"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE