The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Delete per consensus on the 21st century version
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_March_13#Category:21st-century_activists "Not a good idea to categorise activists, not by issue but by century. Different sorts of activists dont have much in common. May even be opposed to each other. And the term activist is modern. Very few people are described as activists before the twentieth century"
Mason (
talk) 23:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Palestinian solidarity activists
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This category isn't for activists who are Palestinian, instead it's for activists on behalf of Palestinian solidarity, regardless of nationality. I model the rename off of similar categories
Category: Activists for African-American civil rights etc.
Mason (
talk) 23:36, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Rename per nom, or delete as not sufficiently defining.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Canada academic book writers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: I don't think being an academic writer is defining. I'm pretty sure that academics are supposed to be writers as well.
Mason (
talk) 20:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:NBA 2k Cover Athletes
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Afghan people by period
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional modern characters
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support Pointless; created by blocked, disruptive user.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 12:24, 3 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support - Very subjective on what is considered "modern". I would also get rid of
Category:Modern people for the same reason.
(Oinkers42) (
talk) 22:04, 6 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional characters from the 6th millennium
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose The nomination does not make sense.
Doctor Who is not set in the 6th millennium, it features characters and settings from various eras. It is is a time travel story.
Dimadick (
talk) 16:19, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:21st-century Dominica people by occupation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: not helpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 15:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:20th-century Dominica people by occupation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: upmerge for now. there's only a single category in here which is not helpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 15:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:20th-century Palauan people by occupation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: upmerge for now. there's only a single category in here which is not helpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 15:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Australian radio and television personalities
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Downmerge. I've added the named child categories to this parent category. I don't see why we should delete instead of downmerge into the respective child categories.
Mason (
talk) 15:58, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Not every presenter/personality is famous on both television and radio, and there are no other parent categories by nationality like this category in question.
Giovanni 0331 (
talk) 16:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Hence, I suggested downmerging.
Mason (
talk) 20:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
At the time there were individual people in the category, but they've been removed. So upmerge is now fine.
Mason (
talk) 23:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional characters by ethnicity or nationality
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support Per nom.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 12:25, 3 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional Canadian characters of Asian descent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, only contains a redirect.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:38, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 03:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fair use media with non-commercial licenses
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Bandy is a sport, so we do need the "non-free" description because there might be similar free images that would belong at Commons. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 07:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 03:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Disney logos
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: I encountered this category including
Disney logo, an article, while this category is for non-free logo files. "Non-free" is also necessary because some Disney-related logos are
too simple to be copyrighted. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 07:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 03:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Such logos should be stored at Wikimedia Commons. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 06:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Non-free icon media
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: To match subcategory and article-content parent
Category:Computer icons; not sure if it should be something that can't be confused with a category for articles. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 07:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 03:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fair use candidates from Commons
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This seems to be an old abandoned project.
User:Commons fair use upload bot was never approved for use at enwiki, and the proposal described in the description is from 2011. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 07:07, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment Category is empty. LizRead!Talk! 04:01, 4 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Virginia Tech images
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Contains only a subcategory for non-free images. Free images should be uploaded to Commons, so this category serves no purpose. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 07:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:21st-century Chadian people by occupation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:African people by nationality and religion
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional sex industry businesspeople
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Made by blocked user, pointless intersection that should be deleted per
WP:NARROWCAT.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 02:35, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom
Mason (
talk) 23:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People in the robotics industry
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Under populated category that overlaps. Only category member is described as a "Roboticist"
Mason (
talk) 00:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Delete per consensus on the 21st century version
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_March_13#Category:21st-century_activists "Not a good idea to categorise activists, not by issue but by century. Different sorts of activists dont have much in common. May even be opposed to each other. And the term activist is modern. Very few people are described as activists before the twentieth century"
Mason (
talk) 23:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Palestinian solidarity activists
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This category isn't for activists who are Palestinian, instead it's for activists on behalf of Palestinian solidarity, regardless of nationality. I model the rename off of similar categories
Category: Activists for African-American civil rights etc.
Mason (
talk) 23:36, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Rename per nom, or delete as not sufficiently defining.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Canada academic book writers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: I don't think being an academic writer is defining. I'm pretty sure that academics are supposed to be writers as well.
Mason (
talk) 20:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:NBA 2k Cover Athletes
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Afghan people by period
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional modern characters
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support Pointless; created by blocked, disruptive user.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 12:24, 3 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support - Very subjective on what is considered "modern". I would also get rid of
Category:Modern people for the same reason.
(Oinkers42) (
talk) 22:04, 6 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional characters from the 6th millennium
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose The nomination does not make sense.
Doctor Who is not set in the 6th millennium, it features characters and settings from various eras. It is is a time travel story.
Dimadick (
talk) 16:19, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:21st-century Dominica people by occupation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: not helpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 15:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:20th-century Dominica people by occupation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: upmerge for now. there's only a single category in here which is not helpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 15:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:20th-century Palauan people by occupation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: upmerge for now. there's only a single category in here which is not helpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 15:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Australian radio and television personalities
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Downmerge. I've added the named child categories to this parent category. I don't see why we should delete instead of downmerge into the respective child categories.
Mason (
talk) 15:58, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Not every presenter/personality is famous on both television and radio, and there are no other parent categories by nationality like this category in question.
Giovanni 0331 (
talk) 16:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Hence, I suggested downmerging.
Mason (
talk) 20:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
At the time there were individual people in the category, but they've been removed. So upmerge is now fine.
Mason (
talk) 23:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional characters by ethnicity or nationality
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support Per nom.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 12:25, 3 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional Canadian characters of Asian descent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, only contains a redirect.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:38, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 03:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fair use media with non-commercial licenses
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Bandy is a sport, so we do need the "non-free" description because there might be similar free images that would belong at Commons. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 07:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 03:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Disney logos
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: I encountered this category including
Disney logo, an article, while this category is for non-free logo files. "Non-free" is also necessary because some Disney-related logos are
too simple to be copyrighted. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 07:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 03:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Such logos should be stored at Wikimedia Commons. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 06:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Non-free icon media
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: To match subcategory and article-content parent
Category:Computer icons; not sure if it should be something that can't be confused with a category for articles. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 07:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 03:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fair use candidates from Commons
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This seems to be an old abandoned project.
User:Commons fair use upload bot was never approved for use at enwiki, and the proposal described in the description is from 2011. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 07:07, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment Category is empty. LizRead!Talk! 04:01, 4 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Virginia Tech images
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Contains only a subcategory for non-free images. Free images should be uploaded to Commons, so this category serves no purpose. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 07:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:21st-century Chadian people by occupation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:African people by nationality and religion
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional sex industry businesspeople
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Made by blocked user, pointless intersection that should be deleted per
WP:NARROWCAT.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 02:35, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom
Mason (
talk) 23:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People in the robotics industry
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Under populated category that overlaps. Only category member is described as a "Roboticist"
Mason (
talk) 00:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.