Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 24#Category:Fictional Tamil people
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Fictional American people by ethnicity. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
23:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose
AHI-3000 (
talk)
00:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support in principle, but it should be dual merged to
Fictional indigenous North American people as well. AHI, if you want to actually keep this category, you need to actually explain your argument.
Mason (
talk)
02:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- In this case no, the two subcategories are already in Category:Fictional indigenous North American people and Category:Fictional indigenous Oceanian people respectively. Marcocapelle ( talk) 09:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- I notice that
User:AHI-3000 removed
Category:Fictional indigenous North American people from the Native Americans subcategory which is particularly unhelpful. So the Native Americans subcategory has to be added back to
Category:Fictional indigenous North American people indeed.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
09:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- I reverted that for Category:Fictional Native American people, as disruptive action while a discussion is going on. The Native Hawaiian category is already in Category:Fictional Polynesian people, which AHI considers to be indigenous Oceanian people (despite also having geography-based children that do not only contain indigenous islanders}}, so that category is not needed there. Place Clichy ( talk) 03:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support in principle, but it should be dual merged to
Fictional indigenous North American people as well. AHI, if you want to actually keep this category, you need to actually explain your argument.
Mason (
talk)
02:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose
AHI-3000 (
talk)
00:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. This intermediate level is not useful at all for navigation, and the well-designed proposition does not remove any information. Place Clichy ( talk) 03:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
04:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Fictional Chinese people by ethnicity to Category:Fictional Chinese people
- Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories. A dual merge is not needed, both subcategories are already directly in
Category:Fictional people by ethnicity.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
23:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Mason ( talk) 04:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Place Clichy ( talk) 03:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure) –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
04:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Domestic workers from Bohemia to Category:People from Bohemia
- Nominator's rationale: Single merge because the only person in here is a courtier, not a domestic worker Mason ( talk) 22:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Just delete, the article is already in Category:10th-century people from Bohemia. Marcocapelle ( talk) 23:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Attack category (but G10 was declined). Utterly lacks collaborative value.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
19:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
"Utterly lacks collaborative value"
. That's just your subjective opinion. And well, who exactly am I attacking? Humans? No it's not an attack. And this is silky micromanaging. — Python Drink ( talk) 22:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)- As I indicated in my reply to you on my talk page, that CSD doesn't apply to me coz my page isn't an article. That's why your G10 didn't work. — Python Drink ( talk) 23:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, opinion-based user category. Marcocapelle ( talk) 22:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- first and foremost, misanthropy is not an opionon. But let's be charitable and say it's an opinon. So literally all the other categories such as Category:Atheist Wikipedians and Category:Wikipedians interested in the United States aren't opinion-based? Python Drink ( talk) 22:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The latter is not opinion-based, these are editors willing to collaborate on United States-related topics. Marcocapelle ( talk) 22:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Well, I'm glad we agree the first is opinion-based (if it's positive atheism). So we're deleting it right? Along with
Category:Nihilist Wikipedians, the subject of which is just as villified as misanthropy? And the myriads of other categories along the lines of "Wikipedians who like [genre of music or film or book and so on] —
Python Drink (
talk)
23:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Honestly, I may well support deleting many of those too. There are a large number of user categories of questionable value, that doesn't justify creating more.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
00:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Same here. Marcocapelle ( talk) 00:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Honestly, I may well support deleting many of those too. There are a large number of user categories of questionable value, that doesn't justify creating more.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
00:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Well, I'm glad we agree the first is opinion-based (if it's positive atheism). So we're deleting it right? Along with
Category:Nihilist Wikipedians, the subject of which is just as villified as misanthropy? And the myriads of other categories along the lines of "Wikipedians who like [genre of music or film or book and so on] —
Python Drink (
talk)
23:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Not defining. Mason ( talk) 04:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. So can we like just let it be, please? We don't have to be so strict. It's actually quite hypocritical. And if we wanna die on this hill, we'd have to do a complete revamp of Wikipedia — Python Drink ( talk) 00:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: 0-level categories are not allowed per
longstanding precedent.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
19:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oh sorry, I wasn't aware that this was discussed in the past. Does this only cover the category or also the level 0 userbox as well?
Ganmatthew (
talk •
contribs)
19:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Only the category. The userbox is fine per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User qwh-0, although I personally do not see the point of its existence. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oh sorry, I wasn't aware that this was discussed in the past. Does this only cover the category or also the level 0 userbox as well?
Ganmatthew (
talk •
contribs)
19:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 22:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Category is empty now. Liz Read! Talk! 19:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Universal Pictures characters and Category:Fictional princesses. (non-admin closure) – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 04:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Feels very much like an WP:ARBITRARYCAT. No real good merge target. Not an actual brand unlike Category:Disney Princess characters. (Oinkers42) ( talk) 16:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Presumably it should also be merged to
Category:Fictional princesses.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
22:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 06:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename as nominated.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster
talk
19:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:LGBT by region to Category:LGBT by location
- Propose renaming Category:LGBT rights by region to Category:LGBT rights by location
- Propose renaming Category:Gender by region to Category:Gender by location
- Nominator's rationale: by location is the usual container category for continents, countries and regions.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
14:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Human rights in the Middle East. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory and one article.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
14:44, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: delete, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. The subcategory is already part of
Category:Women's rights in Asia.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
14:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to
Category:Internet censorship.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster
talk
19:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Internet censorship by region to Category:Internet censorship
- Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
14:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Mason ( talk) 04:18, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster
talk
19:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose deleting Category:Human rights in the former Soviet Union
- Propose deleting Category:Discrimination in the former Soviet Union
- Propose deleting Category:Antisemitism in the former Soviet Union
- Propose deleting Category:Racism in the former Soviet Union
- Nominator's rationale: delete, the intention is apparently to group post Soviet states, but that is not something that we normally do.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
14:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- @
Marcocapelle, a sort of related point about the Soviet Union categories: should they not be named as former countries are. Like the Russian Empire categories are, for example,
Category:People from the Russian Empire, should it not be
Category:People from the Soviet Union rather than
Category:Soviet people.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
14:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- I do not have a strong opinion about that. Marcocapelle ( talk) 14:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 16:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- @
Marcocapelle, a sort of related point about the Soviet Union categories: should they not be named as former countries are. Like the Russian Empire categories are, for example,
Category:People from the Russian Empire, should it not be
Category:People from the Soviet Union rather than
Category:Soviet people.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
14:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to
Category:English sportspeople by sport.
(non-admin closure) –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
04:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:English tennis people to Category:English tennis players
- Nominator's rationale: has only one category layer. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 13:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Upmerge to Category:English sportspeople by sport per nominator's rationale. Upmerging is automated, downmerging isn't, and the effect is the same. Marcocapelle ( talk) 15:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename all as nominated. For clarity,
Category:Tennis players from Greater London currently redirects to
Category:Tennis people from Greater London; consensus here is to overwrite the redirect.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster
talk
19:59, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:English tennis people by county to Category:English tennis players by county
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Berkshire to Category:Tennis players from Berkshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Bristol to Category:Tennis players from Bristol
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Buckinghamshire to Category:Tennis players from Buckinghamshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Cambridgeshire to Category:Tennis players from Cambridgeshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Cheshire to Category:Tennis players from Cheshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Derbyshire to Category:Tennis players from Derbyshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Devon to Category:Tennis players from Devon
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from County Durham to Category:Tennis players from County Durham
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from the East Riding of Yorkshire to Category:Tennis players from the East Riding of Yorkshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from East Sussex to Category:Tennis players from East Sussex
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Essex to Category:Tennis players from Essex
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Gloucestershire to Category:Tennis players from Gloucestershire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Hampshire to Category:Tennis players from Hampshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Hertfordshire to Category:Tennis players from Hertfordshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Kent to Category:Tennis players from Kent
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Lancashire to Category:Tennis players from Lancashire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Lincolnshire to Category:Tennis players from Lincolnshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Greater Manchester to Category:Tennis players from Greater Manchester
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Merseyside to Category:Tennis players from Merseyside
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Norfolk to Category:Tennis players from Norfolk
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from North Yorkshire to Category:Tennis players from North Yorkshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Northamptonshire to Category:Tennis players from Northamptonshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Nottinghamshire to Category:Tennis players from Nottinghamshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Shropshire to Category:Tennis players from Shropshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Somerset to Category:Tennis players from Somerset
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from South Yorkshire to Category:Tennis players from South Yorkshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Staffordshire to Category:Tennis players from Staffordshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Suffolk to Category:Tennis players from Suffolk
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Surrey to Category:Tennis players from Surrey
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Tyne and Wear to Category:Tennis players from Tyne and Wear
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Warwickshire to Category:Tennis players from Warwickshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from the West Midlands (county) to Category:Tennis players from the West Midlands (county)
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from West Yorkshire to Category:Tennis players from West Yorkshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Wiltshire to Category:Tennis players from Wiltshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Worcestershire to Category:Tennis players from Worcestershire
- Nominator's rationale: Contains only tennis players AND is better for navigation.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
13:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Rename the rest but merge
Category:Tennis people from Greater London to the redirect of
Category:Tennis players from Greater London.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
13:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Rename the rest but merge
Category:Tennis people from Greater London to the redirect of
Category:Tennis players from Greater London.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
13:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename as nominated.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster
talk
19:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:German tennis people by state to Category:German tennis players by state
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Baden-Württemberg to Category:Tennis players from Baden-Württemberg
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Bavaria to Category:Tennis players from Bavaria
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Hesse to Category:Tennis players from Hesse
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Lower Saxony to Category:Tennis players from Lower Saxony
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from North Rhine-Westphalia to Category:Tennis players from North Rhine-Westphalia
- Nominator's rationale: Contains only players AND makes navigation easier.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
12:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename.
(non-admin closure) –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
04:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from the Australian Capital Territory to Category:Tennis players from the Australian Capital Territory
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from New South Wales to Category:Tennis players from New South Wales
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Queensland to Category:Tennis players from Queensland
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from South Australia to Category:Tennis players from South Australia
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Tasmania to Category:Tennis players from Tasmania
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Victoria (state) to Category:Tennis players from Victoria (state)
- Nominator's rationale: Contains only players and is consistant with the category name. Also, I would not advise mixing ALL tennis people in one category as it makes navigation harder.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
12:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Rename the rest but merge
Category:Tennis people from Western Australia with the redirect of
Category:Tennis players from Western Australia.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
12:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Rename the rest but merge
Category:Tennis people from Western Australia with the redirect of
Category:Tennis players from Western Australia.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
12:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 04:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: delete, there is no reason to diffuse by century because the country existed for only 12 years.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
06:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Mason ( talk) 22:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
04:11, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose splitting Category:Chechen criminals to Category:Russian criminals and Category:Chechen people
- Nominator's rationale: Merge as this is an intersection between ethnicity and criminality, which is isn't ok Mason ( talk) 06:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Dual merge per nom. It would be different for Chechen independence fighters but that is not what this category is primarily about. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 24#Category:Cultural depictions of female monarchs
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:47, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: There is no "Establishments in the Kingdom of Dahomey" either rename or upmerge to Events in the Kingdom of Dahomey Mason ( talk) 03:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Just delete, the articles are already appropriately in
Category:1843 establishments in Africa and
Category:1889 establishments in Africa and we do not usually put articles about still existing organizations directly in a year or century category.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
06:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Equally fine with me Mason ( talk) 02:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
04:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Proslavery activists killed in the American Civil War to Category:American proslavery activists and Category:People killed in the American Civil War
- Propose merging Category:Fire-Eaters killed in the American Civil War to Category:American Fire-Eaters and Category:United States politicians killed during the Civil War
- Nominator's rationale: Non-defining intersection. It's interesting, but there's not a need to intersect pro-slavery activists who are killed during a specific war. It's the same issue as Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_October_29#Category:Slave_traders_killed_in_the_American_Civil_War Mason ( talk) 03:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Hog Farm Talk 14:38, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: keep.
(non-admin closure)
Mason (
talk)
03:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Ancient Chinese LGBT people to Category:Chinese LGBT people
- Nominator's rationale: Non-defining intersection.
Mason (
talk)
00:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Changed my mind, after seeing that there are other ancient LGBT categories Mason ( talk) 03:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure) –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
04:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:People from Gran Colombia to Category:Gran Colombia
- Nominator's rationale: Overlapping category. This country lasted from 1819 until 1831. There's only one person ( Mary English (Anglo-Colombian)) who isn't also in the child category Category:Presidents of Gran Colombia. Furthermore, "Gran Colombia" isn't ever mentioned on her page Mason ( talk) 00:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Just delete, the subcategory is already directly under Category:Gran Colombia too and the article does not properly belong there. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: dual merge to Category:Dominion of Newfoundland people and Category:Cricketers from Newfoundland and Labrador. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: underpopulated category. only category member is described as a "Newfoundlander" not a "Dominion of Newfoundland" cricketer etc. Same situation as Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_November_22#Category:Journalists_from_the_Dominion_of_Newfoundland Mason ( talk) 00:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Dual merge, also to Category:Dominion of Newfoundland people. No objection to recreate the category when it can be better populated. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Dual merge per Marcocapelle. Place Clichy ( talk) 03:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to
Category:Rhodes Scholars.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster
talk
19:44, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Caribbean Rhodes Scholars to Category:Rhodes Scholars
- Nominator's rationale: Unhelpful for navigation to isolate caribean people from the other rhodes scholars. Mason ( talk) 00:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Merge, the parent category has been diffused by nationality only. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to
Category:Canadian Rhodes Scholars.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster
talk
19:44, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Newfoundland Rhodes Scholars to Category:Canadian Rhodes Scholars
- Nominator's rationale: Intersection between region and award is not defining. The USA doesn't have subcategories by state. Category:American Rhodes Scholars Mason ( talk) 00:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- If kept, rename to Category:Rhodes Scholars from the Dominion of Newfoundland, in order to avoid confusion with Newfoundland (island). Marcocapelle ( talk) 12:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- That might work too, and would require some purging. - RevelationDirect ( talk) 15:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Merge The category header contains (unsourced) information the Rhodes Scholarship article does not: "Starting in 1902, the Dominion of Newfoundland was accorded Rhodes Scholarships as its own geographic constituency." Even assuming that's true, having a separate category up until 1949 when Newfoundland formally joined Canada might make sense but that's not what's going on here: the articles don't normally give a date of receiving the scholarship and based on my guessing with birth dates, this includes post-1949 winners. In practice, this just appears to be a provincial category and fails WP:OCLOCATION. - RevelationDirect ( talk) 15:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: dual merge to Category:Businesspeople from Newfoundland and Labrador and Category:Dominion of Newfoundland people. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Dual merge: intersection between regime and occupation is not defining. Similar situation to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 22#Category:Journalists from the Dominion of Newfoundland Mason ( talk) 00:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Dual merge to both target categories. Place Clichy ( talk) 03:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 24#Category:Fictional Tamil people
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Fictional American people by ethnicity. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
23:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose
AHI-3000 (
talk)
00:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support in principle, but it should be dual merged to
Fictional indigenous North American people as well. AHI, if you want to actually keep this category, you need to actually explain your argument.
Mason (
talk)
02:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- In this case no, the two subcategories are already in Category:Fictional indigenous North American people and Category:Fictional indigenous Oceanian people respectively. Marcocapelle ( talk) 09:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- I notice that
User:AHI-3000 removed
Category:Fictional indigenous North American people from the Native Americans subcategory which is particularly unhelpful. So the Native Americans subcategory has to be added back to
Category:Fictional indigenous North American people indeed.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
09:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- I reverted that for Category:Fictional Native American people, as disruptive action while a discussion is going on. The Native Hawaiian category is already in Category:Fictional Polynesian people, which AHI considers to be indigenous Oceanian people (despite also having geography-based children that do not only contain indigenous islanders}}, so that category is not needed there. Place Clichy ( talk) 03:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support in principle, but it should be dual merged to
Fictional indigenous North American people as well. AHI, if you want to actually keep this category, you need to actually explain your argument.
Mason (
talk)
02:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose
AHI-3000 (
talk)
00:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. This intermediate level is not useful at all for navigation, and the well-designed proposition does not remove any information. Place Clichy ( talk) 03:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
04:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Fictional Chinese people by ethnicity to Category:Fictional Chinese people
- Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories. A dual merge is not needed, both subcategories are already directly in
Category:Fictional people by ethnicity.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
23:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Mason ( talk) 04:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Place Clichy ( talk) 03:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure) –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
04:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Domestic workers from Bohemia to Category:People from Bohemia
- Nominator's rationale: Single merge because the only person in here is a courtier, not a domestic worker Mason ( talk) 22:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Just delete, the article is already in Category:10th-century people from Bohemia. Marcocapelle ( talk) 23:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Attack category (but G10 was declined). Utterly lacks collaborative value.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
19:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
"Utterly lacks collaborative value"
. That's just your subjective opinion. And well, who exactly am I attacking? Humans? No it's not an attack. And this is silky micromanaging. — Python Drink ( talk) 22:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)- As I indicated in my reply to you on my talk page, that CSD doesn't apply to me coz my page isn't an article. That's why your G10 didn't work. — Python Drink ( talk) 23:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, opinion-based user category. Marcocapelle ( talk) 22:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- first and foremost, misanthropy is not an opionon. But let's be charitable and say it's an opinon. So literally all the other categories such as Category:Atheist Wikipedians and Category:Wikipedians interested in the United States aren't opinion-based? Python Drink ( talk) 22:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The latter is not opinion-based, these are editors willing to collaborate on United States-related topics. Marcocapelle ( talk) 22:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Well, I'm glad we agree the first is opinion-based (if it's positive atheism). So we're deleting it right? Along with
Category:Nihilist Wikipedians, the subject of which is just as villified as misanthropy? And the myriads of other categories along the lines of "Wikipedians who like [genre of music or film or book and so on] —
Python Drink (
talk)
23:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Honestly, I may well support deleting many of those too. There are a large number of user categories of questionable value, that doesn't justify creating more.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
00:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Same here. Marcocapelle ( talk) 00:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Honestly, I may well support deleting many of those too. There are a large number of user categories of questionable value, that doesn't justify creating more.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
00:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Well, I'm glad we agree the first is opinion-based (if it's positive atheism). So we're deleting it right? Along with
Category:Nihilist Wikipedians, the subject of which is just as villified as misanthropy? And the myriads of other categories along the lines of "Wikipedians who like [genre of music or film or book and so on] —
Python Drink (
talk)
23:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Not defining. Mason ( talk) 04:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. So can we like just let it be, please? We don't have to be so strict. It's actually quite hypocritical. And if we wanna die on this hill, we'd have to do a complete revamp of Wikipedia — Python Drink ( talk) 00:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: 0-level categories are not allowed per
longstanding precedent.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
19:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oh sorry, I wasn't aware that this was discussed in the past. Does this only cover the category or also the level 0 userbox as well?
Ganmatthew (
talk •
contribs)
19:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Only the category. The userbox is fine per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User qwh-0, although I personally do not see the point of its existence. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oh sorry, I wasn't aware that this was discussed in the past. Does this only cover the category or also the level 0 userbox as well?
Ganmatthew (
talk •
contribs)
19:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 22:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Category is empty now. Liz Read! Talk! 19:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Universal Pictures characters and Category:Fictional princesses. (non-admin closure) – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 04:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Feels very much like an WP:ARBITRARYCAT. No real good merge target. Not an actual brand unlike Category:Disney Princess characters. (Oinkers42) ( talk) 16:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Presumably it should also be merged to
Category:Fictional princesses.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
22:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 06:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename as nominated.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster
talk
19:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:LGBT by region to Category:LGBT by location
- Propose renaming Category:LGBT rights by region to Category:LGBT rights by location
- Propose renaming Category:Gender by region to Category:Gender by location
- Nominator's rationale: by location is the usual container category for continents, countries and regions.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
14:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Human rights in the Middle East. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory and one article.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
14:44, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: delete, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. The subcategory is already part of
Category:Women's rights in Asia.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
14:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to
Category:Internet censorship.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster
talk
19:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Internet censorship by region to Category:Internet censorship
- Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
14:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Mason ( talk) 04:18, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster
talk
19:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose deleting Category:Human rights in the former Soviet Union
- Propose deleting Category:Discrimination in the former Soviet Union
- Propose deleting Category:Antisemitism in the former Soviet Union
- Propose deleting Category:Racism in the former Soviet Union
- Nominator's rationale: delete, the intention is apparently to group post Soviet states, but that is not something that we normally do.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
14:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- @
Marcocapelle, a sort of related point about the Soviet Union categories: should they not be named as former countries are. Like the Russian Empire categories are, for example,
Category:People from the Russian Empire, should it not be
Category:People from the Soviet Union rather than
Category:Soviet people.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
14:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- I do not have a strong opinion about that. Marcocapelle ( talk) 14:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 16:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- @
Marcocapelle, a sort of related point about the Soviet Union categories: should they not be named as former countries are. Like the Russian Empire categories are, for example,
Category:People from the Russian Empire, should it not be
Category:People from the Soviet Union rather than
Category:Soviet people.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
14:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to
Category:English sportspeople by sport.
(non-admin closure) –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
04:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:English tennis people to Category:English tennis players
- Nominator's rationale: has only one category layer. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 13:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Upmerge to Category:English sportspeople by sport per nominator's rationale. Upmerging is automated, downmerging isn't, and the effect is the same. Marcocapelle ( talk) 15:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename all as nominated. For clarity,
Category:Tennis players from Greater London currently redirects to
Category:Tennis people from Greater London; consensus here is to overwrite the redirect.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster
talk
19:59, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:English tennis people by county to Category:English tennis players by county
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Berkshire to Category:Tennis players from Berkshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Bristol to Category:Tennis players from Bristol
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Buckinghamshire to Category:Tennis players from Buckinghamshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Cambridgeshire to Category:Tennis players from Cambridgeshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Cheshire to Category:Tennis players from Cheshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Derbyshire to Category:Tennis players from Derbyshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Devon to Category:Tennis players from Devon
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from County Durham to Category:Tennis players from County Durham
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from the East Riding of Yorkshire to Category:Tennis players from the East Riding of Yorkshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from East Sussex to Category:Tennis players from East Sussex
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Essex to Category:Tennis players from Essex
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Gloucestershire to Category:Tennis players from Gloucestershire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Hampshire to Category:Tennis players from Hampshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Hertfordshire to Category:Tennis players from Hertfordshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Kent to Category:Tennis players from Kent
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Lancashire to Category:Tennis players from Lancashire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Lincolnshire to Category:Tennis players from Lincolnshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Greater Manchester to Category:Tennis players from Greater Manchester
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Merseyside to Category:Tennis players from Merseyside
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Norfolk to Category:Tennis players from Norfolk
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from North Yorkshire to Category:Tennis players from North Yorkshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Northamptonshire to Category:Tennis players from Northamptonshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Nottinghamshire to Category:Tennis players from Nottinghamshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Shropshire to Category:Tennis players from Shropshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Somerset to Category:Tennis players from Somerset
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from South Yorkshire to Category:Tennis players from South Yorkshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Staffordshire to Category:Tennis players from Staffordshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Suffolk to Category:Tennis players from Suffolk
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Surrey to Category:Tennis players from Surrey
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Tyne and Wear to Category:Tennis players from Tyne and Wear
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Warwickshire to Category:Tennis players from Warwickshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from the West Midlands (county) to Category:Tennis players from the West Midlands (county)
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from West Yorkshire to Category:Tennis players from West Yorkshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Wiltshire to Category:Tennis players from Wiltshire
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Worcestershire to Category:Tennis players from Worcestershire
- Nominator's rationale: Contains only tennis players AND is better for navigation.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
13:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Rename the rest but merge
Category:Tennis people from Greater London to the redirect of
Category:Tennis players from Greater London.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
13:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Rename the rest but merge
Category:Tennis people from Greater London to the redirect of
Category:Tennis players from Greater London.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
13:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename as nominated.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster
talk
19:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:German tennis people by state to Category:German tennis players by state
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Baden-Württemberg to Category:Tennis players from Baden-Württemberg
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Bavaria to Category:Tennis players from Bavaria
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Hesse to Category:Tennis players from Hesse
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Lower Saxony to Category:Tennis players from Lower Saxony
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from North Rhine-Westphalia to Category:Tennis players from North Rhine-Westphalia
- Nominator's rationale: Contains only players AND makes navigation easier.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
12:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename.
(non-admin closure) –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
04:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from the Australian Capital Territory to Category:Tennis players from the Australian Capital Territory
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from New South Wales to Category:Tennis players from New South Wales
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Queensland to Category:Tennis players from Queensland
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from South Australia to Category:Tennis players from South Australia
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Tasmania to Category:Tennis players from Tasmania
- Propose renaming Category:Tennis people from Victoria (state) to Category:Tennis players from Victoria (state)
- Nominator's rationale: Contains only players and is consistant with the category name. Also, I would not advise mixing ALL tennis people in one category as it makes navigation harder.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
12:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Rename the rest but merge
Category:Tennis people from Western Australia with the redirect of
Category:Tennis players from Western Australia.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
12:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Rename the rest but merge
Category:Tennis people from Western Australia with the redirect of
Category:Tennis players from Western Australia.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
12:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 04:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: delete, there is no reason to diffuse by century because the country existed for only 12 years.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
06:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Mason ( talk) 22:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
04:11, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose splitting Category:Chechen criminals to Category:Russian criminals and Category:Chechen people
- Nominator's rationale: Merge as this is an intersection between ethnicity and criminality, which is isn't ok Mason ( talk) 06:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Dual merge per nom. It would be different for Chechen independence fighters but that is not what this category is primarily about. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 24#Category:Cultural depictions of female monarchs
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:47, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: There is no "Establishments in the Kingdom of Dahomey" either rename or upmerge to Events in the Kingdom of Dahomey Mason ( talk) 03:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Just delete, the articles are already appropriately in
Category:1843 establishments in Africa and
Category:1889 establishments in Africa and we do not usually put articles about still existing organizations directly in a year or century category.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
06:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Equally fine with me Mason ( talk) 02:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
04:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Proslavery activists killed in the American Civil War to Category:American proslavery activists and Category:People killed in the American Civil War
- Propose merging Category:Fire-Eaters killed in the American Civil War to Category:American Fire-Eaters and Category:United States politicians killed during the Civil War
- Nominator's rationale: Non-defining intersection. It's interesting, but there's not a need to intersect pro-slavery activists who are killed during a specific war. It's the same issue as Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_October_29#Category:Slave_traders_killed_in_the_American_Civil_War Mason ( talk) 03:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Hog Farm Talk 14:38, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: keep.
(non-admin closure)
Mason (
talk)
03:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Ancient Chinese LGBT people to Category:Chinese LGBT people
- Nominator's rationale: Non-defining intersection.
Mason (
talk)
00:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Changed my mind, after seeing that there are other ancient LGBT categories Mason ( talk) 03:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure) –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
04:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:People from Gran Colombia to Category:Gran Colombia
- Nominator's rationale: Overlapping category. This country lasted from 1819 until 1831. There's only one person ( Mary English (Anglo-Colombian)) who isn't also in the child category Category:Presidents of Gran Colombia. Furthermore, "Gran Colombia" isn't ever mentioned on her page Mason ( talk) 00:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Just delete, the subcategory is already directly under Category:Gran Colombia too and the article does not properly belong there. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: dual merge to Category:Dominion of Newfoundland people and Category:Cricketers from Newfoundland and Labrador. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: underpopulated category. only category member is described as a "Newfoundlander" not a "Dominion of Newfoundland" cricketer etc. Same situation as Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_November_22#Category:Journalists_from_the_Dominion_of_Newfoundland Mason ( talk) 00:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Dual merge, also to Category:Dominion of Newfoundland people. No objection to recreate the category when it can be better populated. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Dual merge per Marcocapelle. Place Clichy ( talk) 03:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to
Category:Rhodes Scholars.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster
talk
19:44, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Caribbean Rhodes Scholars to Category:Rhodes Scholars
- Nominator's rationale: Unhelpful for navigation to isolate caribean people from the other rhodes scholars. Mason ( talk) 00:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Merge, the parent category has been diffused by nationality only. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to
Category:Canadian Rhodes Scholars.
(non-admin closure)
House
Blaster
talk
19:44, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Newfoundland Rhodes Scholars to Category:Canadian Rhodes Scholars
- Nominator's rationale: Intersection between region and award is not defining. The USA doesn't have subcategories by state. Category:American Rhodes Scholars Mason ( talk) 00:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- If kept, rename to Category:Rhodes Scholars from the Dominion of Newfoundland, in order to avoid confusion with Newfoundland (island). Marcocapelle ( talk) 12:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- That might work too, and would require some purging. - RevelationDirect ( talk) 15:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Merge The category header contains (unsourced) information the Rhodes Scholarship article does not: "Starting in 1902, the Dominion of Newfoundland was accorded Rhodes Scholarships as its own geographic constituency." Even assuming that's true, having a separate category up until 1949 when Newfoundland formally joined Canada might make sense but that's not what's going on here: the articles don't normally give a date of receiving the scholarship and based on my guessing with birth dates, this includes post-1949 winners. In practice, this just appears to be a provincial category and fails WP:OCLOCATION. - RevelationDirect ( talk) 15:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: dual merge to Category:Businesspeople from Newfoundland and Labrador and Category:Dominion of Newfoundland people. (non-admin closure) House Blaster talk 19:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Dual merge: intersection between regime and occupation is not defining. Similar situation to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 22#Category:Journalists from the Dominion of Newfoundland Mason ( talk) 00:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Dual merge to both target categories. Place Clichy ( talk) 03:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.