The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining trait and appears to be based on OR/Synth. Additionally, the subcategories are wrong. Non-violent and nonkilling video games can be VERY child non-friendly. --
ferret (
talk)
20:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Same thing could be said the other way. Games can be child friendly but be violent and have killing (For example the entire
Splatoon franchise which involves ink guns and weapons). ―
Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654520:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete – per nom. There's no defined standard for a child-friendly video game (ESRB/PEGI/whatever ratings? RSes?) and as such this requires OR.
dudhhrtalkcontribs (he/they)
20:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nonkilling video games
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Basically the same as the rationale for deleting nonviolent video games below. They certainly don't both need to exist as the entries would be nearly identical.
WPscattert/c19:55, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete This one's at least a little less subjective than "child-friendly" and "non-violent" (though I imagine it still has a significant gray area). Still, it's generally unnecessary to categorize things by what they aren't, when they were never assumed to be that in the first place.
Ionmars10 (
talk)
00:29, 9 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nonviolent video games
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Apologies if this is an inappropriate nomination btw. I'm currently looking through all stuff relating to categories to try and understand what should and shouldn't be a category but this doesn't seem to fall under one that should be kept or deleted from what I"m finding. If I'm not finding the right thing please link me to it and I will withdraw my nom. ―
Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654519:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete - not sure such a vague, subjective category is a good idea. At the very least, the creator needs to slow down with its application. I've already found a bunch of poorly applied ones. (Like Arcade soccer games that allow you to check characters onto the ground or into an electric fence. That's decidedly violent.)
Sergecross73msg me20:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
I added the category by mistake but it was reverted, so don't worry. And I will not add the categories to more articles, I'm happy with the demonstration. --
Bawanio (
talk)
20:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete "Nonviolent" is a loaded word and is subject to opinion. As an example, are American Football games violent? Some people might say it is an inherently violent sport that should be banned. Others might say that, since it doesn't involve intent to harm other players, it's fine.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
05:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Both of the members of this category have been written, words and music, by Bilbul, therefore as a writer of songs, more applicable to have him in the written by category
Richhoncho (
talk)
15:46, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Voiceless stops
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Emigrants from the United States to British India
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, not a defining characteristic for the only article in the category about an American women who first toured through British India, then continued to tour through Europe. She only settled in India for permanent after it was no longer "British" India.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
12:37, 18 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Emigrants from the Ottoman Empire to British India
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, not a defining characteristic for the only article in the category about someone who apparently lived in India for only a year and then moved on to the UK.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
12:32, 18 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Meanwhile a different proposal is on the table, namely to merge. A discussion may move in a different direction than as nominated without invalidating the discussion.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
18:12, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Writers about psychopathy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:rename as more specific. In addition the current title goes against
WP:OCASSOC. If this proposal gets support, perhaps other "People by association" categories can be renamed too.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
06:13, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Translators of religions
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
People from the Carolingian Empire
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Organizations designated as terrorist by continent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: rename to reduce ambiguity. The current category titles may also be read as e.g. "Organizations designated as terrorist by some countries in Africa" but that is not the intention of these categories.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
02:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining trait and appears to be based on OR/Synth. Additionally, the subcategories are wrong. Non-violent and nonkilling video games can be VERY child non-friendly. --
ferret (
talk)
20:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Same thing could be said the other way. Games can be child friendly but be violent and have killing (For example the entire
Splatoon franchise which involves ink guns and weapons). ―
Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654520:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete – per nom. There's no defined standard for a child-friendly video game (ESRB/PEGI/whatever ratings? RSes?) and as such this requires OR.
dudhhrtalkcontribs (he/they)
20:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nonkilling video games
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Basically the same as the rationale for deleting nonviolent video games below. They certainly don't both need to exist as the entries would be nearly identical.
WPscattert/c19:55, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete This one's at least a little less subjective than "child-friendly" and "non-violent" (though I imagine it still has a significant gray area). Still, it's generally unnecessary to categorize things by what they aren't, when they were never assumed to be that in the first place.
Ionmars10 (
talk)
00:29, 9 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nonviolent video games
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Apologies if this is an inappropriate nomination btw. I'm currently looking through all stuff relating to categories to try and understand what should and shouldn't be a category but this doesn't seem to fall under one that should be kept or deleted from what I"m finding. If I'm not finding the right thing please link me to it and I will withdraw my nom. ―
Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654519:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete - not sure such a vague, subjective category is a good idea. At the very least, the creator needs to slow down with its application. I've already found a bunch of poorly applied ones. (Like Arcade soccer games that allow you to check characters onto the ground or into an electric fence. That's decidedly violent.)
Sergecross73msg me20:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
I added the category by mistake but it was reverted, so don't worry. And I will not add the categories to more articles, I'm happy with the demonstration. --
Bawanio (
talk)
20:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete "Nonviolent" is a loaded word and is subject to opinion. As an example, are American Football games violent? Some people might say it is an inherently violent sport that should be banned. Others might say that, since it doesn't involve intent to harm other players, it's fine.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
05:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Both of the members of this category have been written, words and music, by Bilbul, therefore as a writer of songs, more applicable to have him in the written by category
Richhoncho (
talk)
15:46, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Voiceless stops
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Emigrants from the United States to British India
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, not a defining characteristic for the only article in the category about an American women who first toured through British India, then continued to tour through Europe. She only settled in India for permanent after it was no longer "British" India.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
12:37, 18 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Emigrants from the Ottoman Empire to British India
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, not a defining characteristic for the only article in the category about someone who apparently lived in India for only a year and then moved on to the UK.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
12:32, 18 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Meanwhile a different proposal is on the table, namely to merge. A discussion may move in a different direction than as nominated without invalidating the discussion.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
18:12, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Writers about psychopathy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:rename as more specific. In addition the current title goes against
WP:OCASSOC. If this proposal gets support, perhaps other "People by association" categories can be renamed too.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
06:13, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Translators of religions
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
People from the Carolingian Empire
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Organizations designated as terrorist by continent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: rename to reduce ambiguity. The current category titles may also be read as e.g. "Organizations designated as terrorist by some countries in Africa" but that is not the intention of these categories.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
02:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.