The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. Given the existence of the "male harem" counterpart, it will be appropriate to redirect the nominated category page. –
FayenaticLondon21:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: The harem genre is assumed to be female by default, thus why male-based harems are referred to as "reverse harems". This category is superfluous and represents overcategorization. Harems centered on female protagonists surrounded by female suitors can be grouped into
Category:LGBT harem anime and manga.
ThanatosApprentice (
talk)
21:01, 15 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Condensed matter
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:North African footballers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete both per nom and Laurel Lodged. Categories like this are only useful for actual nationalities. Imagine the scale of a European footballers category, ha!
No Great Shaker (
talk)
10:54, 31 March 2022 (UTC)reply
We have them. We probably should not have them. Continents are places; they are not the exclusive abode of nationalities. Nations straddle multiple continents.
Laurel Lodged (
talk)
12:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep and properly populateCategory:African footballers as a container. This currently only contains North African items, meaning that the North African cat is useless and it should be deleted. A continent is an appropriate split. With about 200 countries, a global by country category would be inconveniently large for easy navigation.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
14:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Washington Football Team season stubs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The category currently contains 57 pages and the name is not representative of the content within it, as the most recent season article in this category is for the 2003 season, before the team was even named the Washington Football Team. This category is meant to represent the franchise's season articles that are stubs, and it would make more sense to have it under the Washington Commanders name or to revert to the title it had pre-move (Washington Redskins season stubs).
Hey man im josh (
talk)
19:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Merge/rename -- We should follow the practice of alumni categories where merged or renamed institutions take the name of the successor.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
14:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Support - the designation of "Washington Commanders" is for the franchise, not just teams with that name. (The category actually already uses this logic, with the inclusion of seasons from the team's history in Boston before moving to Washington.) As such, the category name should be updated to reflect the current name of the franchise. -
fuzzy510 (
talk)
05:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Songs written by Adriana Evans
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Adriana Evans songs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rusyn villages
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The Rusyn communities category currently contains two subcategories - Rusyn cities and Rusyn villages. I do not think these categories are needed. It would be much more practical to sort communities by their country like in the Ukrainian communities category, not by type.
YoungstownToast (
talk)
23:03, 28 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:NONDEF, many articles do not contain any information about Rusyns and where there is information (e.g. in the articles of the five cities) the Rusyns are a very small minority.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
06:39, 8 March 2022 (UTC)reply
None of the villages/cities are 100% Rusyn. Some of them have Rusyn majorities, but not all. The villages/cities listed have Rusyns, Rusyn speakers, or had Rusyns historically.
YoungstownToast (
talk)
18:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per Marcocapelle and NONDEF. Just took a look at some of the articles and, like
Ňagov for example, there is nothing there to define them as Rusyn communities.
No Great Shaker (
talk)
11:49, 26 March 2022 (UTC)reply
KeepSupport The proposition that this category could be
WP:NONDEF makes no sense as whether communities are wholely Rusyn or majority Rusyn (presently or historically) is simple to establish through proper sourcing. (I would argue based on the work of historians such as
Paul Robert Magocsi that the significance of some of these locales as Rusyn cultural centers is independent of majority population.) Additionally, the inclusion of data within the category can easily be supported through sources from historians and modern or historical censuses. I can go through the locations myself, one-by-one, and provide the relevant sources, but the process will take a couple weeks.
In my opinion, making an attempt to define and source the information would be more constructive than attempting a drive-by deletion.
Edit (18:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC)): Above position changed. Previous vote struck.
We do not categorize populated places by every small ethnic minority. If you find sources to prove the existance of these minorities, feel free to start a list instead of a category.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
22:11, 26 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Your assertion above does not fall under
WP:NONDEF; I'm not sure which guidelines it would. However, this is already quite a substantial category and yet at the moment mostly consisting only of locations within Slovakia. It has potential for expansion with further inclusion of locations in
Galicia and
Zakarpattia Oblast. And in that regard, is not
WP:SMALL--if that is what you are trying to express. KaerbaqianRen💬18:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC)reply
While that may be the case, it is still not a defining characteristic of these villages. It could be source material for a new article though.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
21:36, 14 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Conradiner family members
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, unneeded diffusion because no articles are left in the parent category. Other family categories do not have this kind of diffusion.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
19:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Church Slavonic writers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Purge articles of which it is not clear whether they belong here or belong in the renamed category. (Note that I am open to someone improving the articles in this respect.)
Marcocapelle (
talk)
04:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment -- I am puzzled by this one as to what the difference is between Old and New Church Slavonic. One of the criteria seems to be whether it is written in Glagolitic or Cyrillic script. My guess is that the works of the two authors remained current as a result of being transcribed into the later script.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
15:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Children who followed their parents as heads of state
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. There was no suitable title for renaming suggested or supported. If any user wants to create a list, the contents were:
Comment -- I created the category to help document how many national leaders are children of previous leaders, in non-dynastic families. I think this is a very useful category. It may not be a hugely significant trait in the life of any single person, but collectively, as a category, I think this list of names documents a cluster of similar patterns. I await the replies of the community.
Pete unseth (
talk)
18:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
If this is a notable topic at all it would be better to create a list. Besides if this is not about monarchs the page title should clearly say so.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
18:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Retain - As
Marcocapelle noted, this category is "not a hugely significant trait in the life of any single person in this category". My idea for this category is not that it is so significant in the life of each, but rather that the groups is significant.
Pete unseth (
talk)
18:17, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep but rename. It seems that the intent is to include elected leaders who are not technically head of state (i.e. Westminster parliaments) and to exclude monarchs and dynastic families (for whom this feature is assumed, and non-defining). How about "Elected leaders who are children of former elected leaders"? I'm sure a better wordsmith can come up with something more fitting. I disagree about nepotism: besides the Kims (who are a dynastic family) most of the names on this list were not appointed to their position by their parent.
Ivanvector (Talk/Edits)
18:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
I also disagree about non-defining: besides the Kims (who I didn't check) all but one of the current member articles mentions that person's parent in the lede, and with only two exceptions in the first paragraph. Anecdotally:
Justin Trudeau (who is not currently on the list but there's a dispute about adding the category on that talk page) hasn't done a single controversial thing in his entire premiership without some white-haired pundit comparing his action to what they surmise his father,
Pierre Trudeau, would have done in the same circumstance. However, reading through these articles it's clear that "elected" is completely the wrong word to use.
Ivanvector (Talk/Edits)
18:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
And all that being said, I also endorse the creation of a list article for this (under a better title) though the existence of a list doesn't automatically preclude the existence of a companion category.
Ivanvector (Talk/Edits)
18:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep (possibly renamed). I do not understand why George H.W. Bush is not included, even though he was not his father's immediate successor. However the category should either exclude monarchies or treat them (together) as a single subcategory. A title that would bring in
Justin Trudeau might be appropriate, though he is head of government, not head of state.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
19:34, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Why exactly is not
Elizabeth II on this list? For most of human history most states had the explicit plan that in most cases the new head would be the child of the last. To be fair most states in human history were extremely small, and lots of them we do not have articles on. Despite our claim that all heads of state are default notable, we probably have articles on less than half of all heads of state ever. However that does not change the fact that this is way, way too common to de defining.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
20:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak delete – As noted by others, the title of this category is a bit wonky and unnecessarily contorted, and it is to some degree non-defining. The apparent intent here is to create a grouping of "Children of non-monarchical national leaders who became national leaders" (head of government and/or of state). That does not sound like an essential—defining—characteristics of an individual. Rather, it sounds like a title of a stand-alone list article. I would find such an article quite interesting.
Drdpw (
talk)
16:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Unless it should also have
George W. Bush and
John Quincy Adams, I believe it also has the idea of directly succeeding in there, so "Children of non-monarchial national leaders who became national leader direct after their parent". I also am not confident that the line between a monarchical and non-monarchical leader is clear enough to categorize on.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
17:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Poorly thought out, non-defining category. No value in lumping Bush Sr, Junior, a bunch of monarchs, and by the looks of the pending Philippines election, Ferdinand Marcos Sr. and Jr..
ValarianB (
talk)
20:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The word "elected" is questionable in cases when no free elections take place. There was an objection against this word earlier in this discussion as well.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
15:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Further comment (already voted delete): meanwhile George Bush junior has been removed from the category while Bush was positioned in the header of the category page as a prime example. Moreover, I think the category no longer contains any properly elected leader. If the category is kept (which is meanwhile even more dubious than before) the header of the category page should be rewritten.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
20:25, 15 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Note: I have trimmed the header to read, This category is meant to include children who followed their parents as heads of state. It includes both dictators and elected leaders, but not royal successors.
Drdpw (
talk)
18:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: merge per
WP:SMALLCAT, only 2 or 3 articles in each of these categories. Note that the large majority of these establishments is not notable, even while a city may be full of them.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
11:42, 8 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Arthur (TV series) mass media and merchandise
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Lower Yangtze Mandarin
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:transit of Mercury
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment: either name is technically suitable. However, 'transit of Mercury' appears to have more frequent usage in published scientific papers than 'Mercury transit'. The current naming scheme is consistent with other transit articles. (Cf.
Category:Astronomical transits.) But if we do change this then we should change the others based on the same logic.
Praemonitus (
talk)
14:30, 17 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. Given the existence of the "male harem" counterpart, it will be appropriate to redirect the nominated category page. –
FayenaticLondon21:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: The harem genre is assumed to be female by default, thus why male-based harems are referred to as "reverse harems". This category is superfluous and represents overcategorization. Harems centered on female protagonists surrounded by female suitors can be grouped into
Category:LGBT harem anime and manga.
ThanatosApprentice (
talk)
21:01, 15 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Condensed matter
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:North African footballers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete both per nom and Laurel Lodged. Categories like this are only useful for actual nationalities. Imagine the scale of a European footballers category, ha!
No Great Shaker (
talk)
10:54, 31 March 2022 (UTC)reply
We have them. We probably should not have them. Continents are places; they are not the exclusive abode of nationalities. Nations straddle multiple continents.
Laurel Lodged (
talk)
12:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep and properly populateCategory:African footballers as a container. This currently only contains North African items, meaning that the North African cat is useless and it should be deleted. A continent is an appropriate split. With about 200 countries, a global by country category would be inconveniently large for easy navigation.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
14:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Washington Football Team season stubs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The category currently contains 57 pages and the name is not representative of the content within it, as the most recent season article in this category is for the 2003 season, before the team was even named the Washington Football Team. This category is meant to represent the franchise's season articles that are stubs, and it would make more sense to have it under the Washington Commanders name or to revert to the title it had pre-move (Washington Redskins season stubs).
Hey man im josh (
talk)
19:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Merge/rename -- We should follow the practice of alumni categories where merged or renamed institutions take the name of the successor.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
14:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Support - the designation of "Washington Commanders" is for the franchise, not just teams with that name. (The category actually already uses this logic, with the inclusion of seasons from the team's history in Boston before moving to Washington.) As such, the category name should be updated to reflect the current name of the franchise. -
fuzzy510 (
talk)
05:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Songs written by Adriana Evans
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Adriana Evans songs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rusyn villages
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The Rusyn communities category currently contains two subcategories - Rusyn cities and Rusyn villages. I do not think these categories are needed. It would be much more practical to sort communities by their country like in the Ukrainian communities category, not by type.
YoungstownToast (
talk)
23:03, 28 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:NONDEF, many articles do not contain any information about Rusyns and where there is information (e.g. in the articles of the five cities) the Rusyns are a very small minority.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
06:39, 8 March 2022 (UTC)reply
None of the villages/cities are 100% Rusyn. Some of them have Rusyn majorities, but not all. The villages/cities listed have Rusyns, Rusyn speakers, or had Rusyns historically.
YoungstownToast (
talk)
18:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per Marcocapelle and NONDEF. Just took a look at some of the articles and, like
Ňagov for example, there is nothing there to define them as Rusyn communities.
No Great Shaker (
talk)
11:49, 26 March 2022 (UTC)reply
KeepSupport The proposition that this category could be
WP:NONDEF makes no sense as whether communities are wholely Rusyn or majority Rusyn (presently or historically) is simple to establish through proper sourcing. (I would argue based on the work of historians such as
Paul Robert Magocsi that the significance of some of these locales as Rusyn cultural centers is independent of majority population.) Additionally, the inclusion of data within the category can easily be supported through sources from historians and modern or historical censuses. I can go through the locations myself, one-by-one, and provide the relevant sources, but the process will take a couple weeks.
In my opinion, making an attempt to define and source the information would be more constructive than attempting a drive-by deletion.
Edit (18:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC)): Above position changed. Previous vote struck.
We do not categorize populated places by every small ethnic minority. If you find sources to prove the existance of these minorities, feel free to start a list instead of a category.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
22:11, 26 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Your assertion above does not fall under
WP:NONDEF; I'm not sure which guidelines it would. However, this is already quite a substantial category and yet at the moment mostly consisting only of locations within Slovakia. It has potential for expansion with further inclusion of locations in
Galicia and
Zakarpattia Oblast. And in that regard, is not
WP:SMALL--if that is what you are trying to express. KaerbaqianRen💬18:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC)reply
While that may be the case, it is still not a defining characteristic of these villages. It could be source material for a new article though.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
21:36, 14 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Conradiner family members
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, unneeded diffusion because no articles are left in the parent category. Other family categories do not have this kind of diffusion.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
19:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Church Slavonic writers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Purge articles of which it is not clear whether they belong here or belong in the renamed category. (Note that I am open to someone improving the articles in this respect.)
Marcocapelle (
talk)
04:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment -- I am puzzled by this one as to what the difference is between Old and New Church Slavonic. One of the criteria seems to be whether it is written in Glagolitic or Cyrillic script. My guess is that the works of the two authors remained current as a result of being transcribed into the later script.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
15:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Children who followed their parents as heads of state
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. There was no suitable title for renaming suggested or supported. If any user wants to create a list, the contents were:
Comment -- I created the category to help document how many national leaders are children of previous leaders, in non-dynastic families. I think this is a very useful category. It may not be a hugely significant trait in the life of any single person, but collectively, as a category, I think this list of names documents a cluster of similar patterns. I await the replies of the community.
Pete unseth (
talk)
18:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
If this is a notable topic at all it would be better to create a list. Besides if this is not about monarchs the page title should clearly say so.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
18:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Retain - As
Marcocapelle noted, this category is "not a hugely significant trait in the life of any single person in this category". My idea for this category is not that it is so significant in the life of each, but rather that the groups is significant.
Pete unseth (
talk)
18:17, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep but rename. It seems that the intent is to include elected leaders who are not technically head of state (i.e. Westminster parliaments) and to exclude monarchs and dynastic families (for whom this feature is assumed, and non-defining). How about "Elected leaders who are children of former elected leaders"? I'm sure a better wordsmith can come up with something more fitting. I disagree about nepotism: besides the Kims (who are a dynastic family) most of the names on this list were not appointed to their position by their parent.
Ivanvector (Talk/Edits)
18:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
I also disagree about non-defining: besides the Kims (who I didn't check) all but one of the current member articles mentions that person's parent in the lede, and with only two exceptions in the first paragraph. Anecdotally:
Justin Trudeau (who is not currently on the list but there's a dispute about adding the category on that talk page) hasn't done a single controversial thing in his entire premiership without some white-haired pundit comparing his action to what they surmise his father,
Pierre Trudeau, would have done in the same circumstance. However, reading through these articles it's clear that "elected" is completely the wrong word to use.
Ivanvector (Talk/Edits)
18:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
And all that being said, I also endorse the creation of a list article for this (under a better title) though the existence of a list doesn't automatically preclude the existence of a companion category.
Ivanvector (Talk/Edits)
18:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep (possibly renamed). I do not understand why George H.W. Bush is not included, even though he was not his father's immediate successor. However the category should either exclude monarchies or treat them (together) as a single subcategory. A title that would bring in
Justin Trudeau might be appropriate, though he is head of government, not head of state.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
19:34, 24 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Why exactly is not
Elizabeth II on this list? For most of human history most states had the explicit plan that in most cases the new head would be the child of the last. To be fair most states in human history were extremely small, and lots of them we do not have articles on. Despite our claim that all heads of state are default notable, we probably have articles on less than half of all heads of state ever. However that does not change the fact that this is way, way too common to de defining.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
20:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak delete – As noted by others, the title of this category is a bit wonky and unnecessarily contorted, and it is to some degree non-defining. The apparent intent here is to create a grouping of "Children of non-monarchical national leaders who became national leaders" (head of government and/or of state). That does not sound like an essential—defining—characteristics of an individual. Rather, it sounds like a title of a stand-alone list article. I would find such an article quite interesting.
Drdpw (
talk)
16:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Unless it should also have
George W. Bush and
John Quincy Adams, I believe it also has the idea of directly succeeding in there, so "Children of non-monarchial national leaders who became national leader direct after their parent". I also am not confident that the line between a monarchical and non-monarchical leader is clear enough to categorize on.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
17:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Poorly thought out, non-defining category. No value in lumping Bush Sr, Junior, a bunch of monarchs, and by the looks of the pending Philippines election, Ferdinand Marcos Sr. and Jr..
ValarianB (
talk)
20:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The word "elected" is questionable in cases when no free elections take place. There was an objection against this word earlier in this discussion as well.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
15:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Further comment (already voted delete): meanwhile George Bush junior has been removed from the category while Bush was positioned in the header of the category page as a prime example. Moreover, I think the category no longer contains any properly elected leader. If the category is kept (which is meanwhile even more dubious than before) the header of the category page should be rewritten.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
20:25, 15 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Note: I have trimmed the header to read, This category is meant to include children who followed their parents as heads of state. It includes both dictators and elected leaders, but not royal successors.
Drdpw (
talk)
18:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: merge per
WP:SMALLCAT, only 2 or 3 articles in each of these categories. Note that the large majority of these establishments is not notable, even while a city may be full of them.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
11:42, 8 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Arthur (TV series) mass media and merchandise
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Lower Yangtze Mandarin
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:transit of Mercury
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment: either name is technically suitable. However, 'transit of Mercury' appears to have more frequent usage in published scientific papers than 'Mercury transit'. The current naming scheme is consistent with other transit articles. (Cf.
Category:Astronomical transits.) But if we do change this then we should change the others based on the same logic.
Praemonitus (
talk)
14:30, 17 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.